fix: resposiveness issue in the survey's hidden fields#3952
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@DivyanshuLohani is attempting to deploy a commit to the formbricks Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/app/(app)/(survey-editor)/environments/[environmentId]/surveys/[surveyId]/edit/components/HiddenFieldsCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
144-190: Great addition of the form for adding new hidden fields!The implementation of the form for adding new hidden fields is well-done and addresses the functionality improvements mentioned in the PR objectives. The validation logic ensures the uniqueness of the new hidden field ID, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity. The use of toast notifications for user feedback is a good practice.
One minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a check to prevent submission of an empty hidden field ID. This can be done by disabling the submit button when the input is empty or by adding a validation check at the beginning of the form submission handler.
Example:
if (hiddenField.trim() === "") { toast.error("Hidden field ID cannot be empty"); return; }This additional check would prevent unnecessary validation and improve user experience.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/web/app/(app)/(survey-editor)/environments/[environmentId]/surveys/[surveyId]/edit/components/HiddenFieldsCard.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/web/app/(app)/(survey-editor)/environments/[environmentId]/surveys/[surveyId]/edit/components/HiddenFieldsCard.tsx (2)
128-128: Excellent fix for the responsiveness issue!The addition of
flex-wrapto the container's class is a simple yet effective solution to the responsiveness problem mentioned in the PR objectives. This change allows the hidden field tags to wrap to the next line when there's insufficient horizontal space, preventing the UI from breaking when multiple fields are added.
Line range hint
1-190: Overall assessment: Excellent implementation addressing the PR objectivesThe changes in this file effectively solve the responsiveness issue with the hidden fields card and enhance its functionality. Key points:
- The layout fix using
flex-wrapresolves the UI breaking problem when multiple fields are added.- The new form for adding hidden fields is well-implemented with proper validation and error handling.
- The code maintains good practices in terms of state management, user feedback, and React patterns.
These changes align perfectly with the PR objectives and significantly improve the user experience of the survey editor. Great job!
|
Awarding DivyanshuLohani: 150 points 🕹️ Well done! Check out your new contribution on oss.gg/DivyanshuLohani |
What does this PR do?
Fixes the responsiveness bug in the hidden fields card on the survey edit/create page

Fixes #3882
How should this be tested?
Checklist
Required
pnpm buildconsole.logsgit pull origin mainAppreciated
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes