fix: properly apply bindTextureResource in render_pass_descriptor:one_*_attachment tests#4447
Merged
ErichDonGubler merged 1 commit intogpuweb:mainfrom Aug 26, 2025
Conversation
Member
Author
|
I found this while trying to determine why CTS hadn't caught the bug motivating D261679. Oopsie! |
Member
Author
CC @beaufortfrancois, as the author of this PR. |
8 tasks
…one_*_attachment` tests This is a bug in gpuweb#4407, where this coverage was originally intended to be introduced.
ErichDonGubler
force-pushed
the
bindTextureResource-for-one-attachment-plz
branch
from
affe15a to
872797e
Compare
greggman
pushed a commit
to greggman/cts
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2025
…one_*_attachment` tests (gpuweb#4447) This is a bug in gpuweb#4407, where this coverage was originally intended to be introduced.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a bug in #4407, where this coverage was originally intended to be introduced.