Skip to content

Make strategic function application operators handle strategies correctly#61

Merged
konsumlamm merged 1 commit intohaskell:masterfrom
konsumlamm:strategic-operators
Jan 21, 2024
Merged

Make strategic function application operators handle strategies correctly#61
konsumlamm merged 1 commit intohaskell:masterfrom
konsumlamm:strategic-operators

Conversation

@konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #43.

@konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@simonmar what do you think?

@konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@simonmar ?

@konsumlamm konsumlamm mentioned this pull request Dec 29, 2023
@Kleidukos Kleidukos requested a review from treeowl January 19, 2024 15:48
Copy link
Contributor

@treeowl treeowl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Kleidukos do you still want to review or can I go ahead and merge?

Copy link
Member

@Kleidukos Kleidukos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@konsumlamm konsumlamm merged commit b60237e into haskell:master Jan 21, 2024
@konsumlamm konsumlamm deleted the strategic-operators branch January 21, 2024 20:21
konsumlamm added a commit to treeowl/parallel that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Strategic function application operators don't quite match their documentation

3 participants