Add to WorkingCopyCapabilities enum to reflect usage.#105020
Merged
bpasero merged 3 commits intomicrosoft:masterfrom Aug 24, 2020
Merged
Add to WorkingCopyCapabilities enum to reflect usage.#105020bpasero merged 3 commits intomicrosoft:masterfrom
bpasero merged 3 commits intomicrosoft:masterfrom
Conversation
The capabilities field was being used with a value of 0 in a few places that implemented the IWorkingCopy interface. This inconsistency wasn't picked up by the compiler because the value in the enum was specified as `1 << 1` and not as `2`. This changes the value to be specified as `2` (for better type checking) and makes the 0 to use the new enum value.
Member
|
Thanks, I pushed b2b9ccf to adopt this. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The capabilities field was being used with a value of 0 in a few places that implemented the IWorkingCopy interface. This inconsistency wasn't picked up by the compiler because the value in the enum was specified as
1 << 1and not as2. This changes the value to be specified as2(for better type checking) and makes the 0 to use the new enum value.This PR fixes #104866