This seems like a small (but important) contribution, so no Contribution License Agreement is required at this point. We will now review your pull request.
Thanks,
Microsoft Pull Request Bot

Can you take a look at cases like:

[good](https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb613488(v=vs.85).aspx) text (other text)

With the current change, the link is incorrectly detected as: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb613488(v=vs.85).aspx)

Thanks for reviewing! @mjbvz

I am trying with the following pattern:

/(\[[^\]]*\]\(\s*?)([^\s]+)\)/g

It accomplishes with most of cases including the one you mentioned except ([tag](link)), i.e. referencing within parentheses.

I guess it's more natural to think that the first parenthesis is part of markdown syntax and not the second one, however in this scenario we are not interpreting like that given we are capturing as much parentheses as we can instead of capturing as least as possible (Original design) as response to #25870.
I am not sure if we should consider this as an error since there may be another interpretation, what do you think? Btw any pointer is more than welcome, I feel somehow hard to fulfill two contradictory situations.

(Please let me know if we should redirect the discussion to issue)

@mjbvz I just pushed a new link pattern and seems to work with my test cases and root README, please let me if is anything is wrong.

Great! Thanks for the follow up on this.

The change will be available in the next insiders build