Fix junit writing bug introduced in #16388#16417
Merged
msullivan merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom Nov 7, 2023
Merged
Conversation
msullivan
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2023
Contributor
|
Diff from mypy_primer, showing the effect of this PR on open source code: discord.py (https://github.com/Rapptz/discord.py): typechecking got 1.08x faster (172.1s -> 158.9s)
(Performance measurements are based on a single noisy sample)
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#16388 introduced a bug where, with
--junit-format=global, the junit file would indicate an error (with no message) even if everything passed. That was because_generate_junit_contentswould check ifmessages_by_filewas empty or not to determine if there were failures, but with--junit-format=globalwe'd pass in a dictionary of the form{None: all_messages};all_messageswould be empty, but the resulting dictionary wouldn't be.The fix is to pass in an empty dictionary if there are no messages.
I've tested manually with
--junit-format=globaland--junit-format=per_filein the successful case to make sure the files are written correctly now.