[mypyc] feat: further optimize equality check with string literals [1/1]#19883
Merged
JukkaL merged 31 commits intopython:masterfrom Oct 14, 2025
Merged
[mypyc] feat: further optimize equality check with string literals [1/1]#19883JukkaL merged 31 commits intopython:masterfrom
JukkaL merged 31 commits intopython:masterfrom
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
BobTheBuidler
commented
Oct 1, 2025
BobTheBuidler
commented
Oct 1, 2025
mypyc/irbuild/ll_builder.py
Outdated
| return self.primitive_op(str_eq, [lhs, rhs], line) | ||
| elif op == "!=": | ||
| eq = self.primitive_op(str_eq, [lhs, rhs], line) | ||
| if is_string_literal(lhs): |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looking at this again, I think we can just refactor this whole block for "!=" into:
return self.add(ComparisonOp(compare_strings(lhs, rhs, line), self.false(), ComparisonOp.EQ, line)
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Closed
BobTheBuidler
commented
Oct 13, 2025
| Py_ssize_t str1_length = PyUnicode_GET_LENGTH(str1); | ||
| if (str1_length != str2_length) | ||
| return 0; | ||
| int kind = PyUnicode_KIND(str1); |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we deduce a literal's kind at compile time as well?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like there isn't a good way to reliably do this
JukkaL
reviewed
Oct 14, 2025
| if is_string_literal(lhs): | ||
| if is_string_literal(rhs): | ||
| # we can optimize out the check entirely in some constant-folded cases | ||
| return self.true() if lhs.value == rhs.value else self.false() |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a irbuild test cases for constant folding.
| return self.true() if lhs.value == rhs.value else self.false() | ||
|
|
||
| # if lhs argument is string literal, switch sides to match specializer C api | ||
| lhs, rhs = rhs, lhs |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add irbuild test case for string literal as the lhs.
JukkaL
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR further optimizes string equality checks against literals by getting rid of the PyUnicode_GET_LENGTH call against the literal value, which is not necessary since the value is known at compile-time
I think this optimization will be helpful in cases where the non-literal string DOES match but is actually a subtype of string (actual strings instances that match would be caught by the identity check), or in cases where an exact string does NOT match. But we can also extend this implementation to use c-strings in certain cases where we know at compile-time that the literal value is compact ascii. Actually, maybe I should do that now? Thoughts?