refactor: simplify Rake::Application#system_dir method#591
Merged
hsbt merged 1 commit intoruby:masterfrom Dec 9, 2024
Merged
Conversation
ENV["RAKE_SYSTEM"] lookupRake::Application#system_dir method
|
👍 |
Rake::Application#system_dir methodRake::Application#system_dir method
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Due to it being a tad convoluted, it took me longer than it probably should have to grok what the
Rake::Application#system_dirmethod was trying to do.I think this simplification makes it a lot more obvious, especially as the same ...
... idiom is already used elsewhere in the
rakecodebase.It also avoids a double hash lookup: one lookup to see if
RAKE_SYSTEMis set in theENVhash, and - if it is - exactly the same lookup again to actually fetch its value. 🎉PS - I was tempted to also include the following change in this PR ... happy to take your steer @hsbt : include it in this one, or issue a separate PR instead? (or else forget about it altogether if it's totally bonkers?) 😅