Skip to content

Schema.org should define how to use SKOS-like vocabularies #251

@danbri

Description

@danbri

Migrating in from https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/30

    Stephane Corlosquet, Jean Delahousse and others have explored proposals
    for representing SKOS in Schema.org. After much discussion on 
    [email protected] and amongst schema.org partners, we didn't 
    achieve consensus on doing this. A followup proposal "MiniSKOS" 
    has received broadly positive feedback. This issue tracks the 
    MiniSKOS proposal.

    See http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SKOS for earlier discussion, 
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Nov/0121.html for miniskos proposal.

This also relates to the issues we sometimes discuss as 'external enumerations'.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

no-issue-activityDiscuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).schema.org vocabGeneral top level tag for issues on the vocabulary

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions