Skip to content

Remove "commercial" bias from GoodRelations elements #424

@mfhepp

Description

@mfhepp

Product, Offer, and other elements from GoodRelations currently use labels and descriptions that are sometimes too tightly bound to traditional commercial transactions, while the underlying GoodRelations makes no such assumptions (e.g. that the compensation has to be a monetary amount).

By updating the description for those elements, we can mitigate many of the potential inconsistencies in schema.org, e.g. that some user communities do not feel that the objects or services they are offering are "products".

This is related to the task of supporting barter trade and non-monetary compensations in schema.org/GoodRelations.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

no-issue-activityDiscuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).schema.org vocabGeneral top level tag for issues on the vocabularystatus:work expectedWe are likely to, or would like to, or probably should try, ... to do something in this area.type:cleanup + clarityAddresses wording fixes, ambiguities, confusion, bad examples etc

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions