Skip to content

Change redundant 'text' entry to 'name' in ld+json example for Question#1799

Merged
chaals merged 1 commit intoschemaorg:masterfrom
fisxoj:fix-question-example
Nov 21, 2017
Merged

Change redundant 'text' entry to 'name' in ld+json example for Question#1799
chaals merged 1 commit intoschemaorg:masterfrom
fisxoj:fix-question-example

Conversation

@fisxoj
Copy link

@fisxoj fisxoj commented Nov 20, 2017

Hello! I did a quick look around for contribution guidelines, and hopefully this is simple enough not to be too much trouble, regardless.

The example for Question had the field text twice. I believe the first entry is supposed to be name, based on the other examples for the same item.

@fisxoj fisxoj changed the title Change redundant 'text' entry to 'name' in ld+json example Change redundant 'text' entry to 'name' in ld+json example for Questino Nov 20, 2017
@fisxoj fisxoj changed the title Change redundant 'text' entry to 'name' in ld+json example for Questino Change redundant 'text' entry to 'name' in ld+json example for Question Nov 20, 2017
@chaals chaals merged commit 5211bc8 into schemaorg:master Nov 21, 2017
@chaals
Copy link
Contributor

chaals commented Nov 21, 2017

Yes, spot on. Thank you!

@fisxoj fisxoj deleted the fix-question-example branch November 21, 2017 13:56
@ian-axelrod
Copy link

This is a landmark PR. Thank you for all your hard work!!

@gkellogg
Copy link
Contributor

Note that errors like this are actually detected in Travis-CI: https://travis-ci.org/schemaorg/schemaorg, although these have only been in as unexamined warnings for some time, due to the volume of examples having semantic or syntactic problems (most of the syntactic problems have been found, at least). The idea would be to eventually make errors fail CI, which would prevent a PR from being merged until corrected, and thus not introduce new example errors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants