Remove @value clauses from Periodical JSON-LD examples#925
Merged
danbri merged 1 commit intoschemaorg:masterfrom Dec 9, 2015
Merged
Remove @value clauses from Periodical JSON-LD examples#925danbri merged 1 commit intoschemaorg:masterfrom
danbri merged 1 commit intoschemaorg:masterfrom
Conversation
The JSON-LD examples for ScholarlyArticle included unnecessary @value clauses due to a naive conversion from the RDFa source. Remove them, so instead of: "datePublished": { "@value": "2006-10", "@type": "xsd:gYearMonth" }, we'll have the much simpler, easier to publish and consume: "datePublished": "2006-10", Fixes schemaorg#904. Signed-off-by: Dan Scott <[email protected]>
danbri
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2015
Remove @value clauses from Periodical JSON-LD examples
Contributor
|
thanks! and for the git tips. I'd forgotten about cherry-pick... |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The JSON-LD examples for ScholarlyArticle included unnecessary @value
clauses due to a naive conversion from the RDFa source. Remove them, so
instead of:
we'll have the much simpler, easier to publish and consume:
Fixes #904.
Signed-off-by: Dan Scott [email protected]