Conversation
Hide behind `distributed_optimize_skip_select_on_unused_shards` setting.
Softagram Impact Report for pull/1 (head commit: 0bc9776)⭐ Visual OverviewChanged elements and changed dependencies. ⭐ Change ImpactHow the changed files are used by the rest of the project 📄 Full report
Give feedback of this report to [email protected] |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



This pull request adds
distributed_optimize_skip_select_on_unused_shards. When doing SELECT from Distributed tables, it will try to perform constant folding for sharding expression, based on constraints from WHERE condition, and determine if it's possible to query a subset of nodes of a cluster.It's useful to:
It assumes that data is sharded according to sharding key, it might not be true, that's why it isn't enabled by default.
Limitations:
ANDandOR, doesn't handle queries likeSELECT ... FROM ... WHERE jumpConsistentHash(x, 2) = 1NB: the last time I wrote C++ was 10 years ago
I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://yandex.ru/legal/cla/?lang=en