Conversation
lcarva
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see this check detected two failures under third_party. Should we configure it to ignore that path?
There didn't seem to be an easy way to ignore the path for Go :( Looking at this directory though, it seems very stale since we don't have any automation ensuring this stays up to date. AFAICT the top level licenses and source code (for things like MPL) are already included |
e72c9dd to
09181ff
Compare
|
/hold We need to tweak how we're handling licenses for publishing. This will need a bit more work. >_> |
|
jk we tar up the entire vendor folder as part of releases - we're good to go! /hold cancel |
License files and source code are already present in `vendor`. This is mostly duplicate data that isn't kept up to date.
|
@lcarva rebased to fix the test failures. needs another lgtm! 🙏 |
lcarva
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm
-88,828 loc, very nice!
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lcarva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Changes
Submitter Checklist
As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:
functionality, content, code)
Release Notes