Please change target branch to vim-volt:devel .

I noticed a (non-functional) difference between the example in the README and the actual plugconf template: In the README the comments for the plugconf functions are written at the top of the function definition. In the actual template they are witten inside the function defintion.

I actually think putting them on top of the function definition makes more sense, since otherwise they cannnot easily be differentiated to the comments the user adds into the function defintion. Maybe the template should be changed to put the comments on top of the functions?

Thanks for the fix #275 ! 😄

And another thing: While it makes utter sense to differentiate between configuration that has to be done before loading and configuration that has to be done after loading, the function names s:on_load_pre and s:on_load_post aren't as nice as s:config. s:config makes it clear that it is intended to be used for configuration settings. s:on_load_pre and s:on_load_post actually do make clear when they are being executed, but the intention isn't that clear anymore. Nevertheless, I don't have a suggestion for better names at the moment. :-) Just wanted to bring it to the table. Maybe someone else has an idea if those could functions could be better named.

Okay, so could you file an another issue?
We could hear the other person's ideas there.
Personally I slightly agree that the functions are not nice names, but it has already been changed once.
I don't want to easily change the function names in terms of compatibility.

Thanks!