Fixing missed "CEPC" mentions and attribution error#288
Conversation
wareid
requested review from
TzviyaSiegman and
dbooth-boston
and removed request for
TzviyaSiegman
| <dd> | ||
| <p> | ||
| Language or behaviour that may appear kind or helpful but conveys a feeling of superiority or condescension. | ||
| Language or behaviour that may appear kind or helpful but conveys a feeling of superiority or condescension. <cite><a href="https://languages.oup.com/">Adapted from the Oxford Languages Dictionary.</a></cite> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's a shame that access to the dictionary appears to be behind a paywall - the cited link is not to a dictionary but to a landing page for Oxford Languages. Not sure what change could improve that other than using a definition from a more open dictionary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can access the definition by googling "patronizing", which pops up the google dictionary feature powered by Oxford. There is a direct URL but it's a bit messy, I could use it though.
I did look at other definitions from sources like Merriam-Webster and Cambridge Dictionary, but felt this one captured the meaning most clearly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess a Google link may at some point in the future not resolve to Oxford Languages, since they could switch provider at any time. Hmm, tricky, I don't have a good alternative suggestion.
4 participants
Recent merges accidentally added "CEPC" back into the document, I have fixed that.
Also added the missing attribution for "patronizing" as mentioned in issue #264.
Preview | Diff