Editorial rewrite of section on charter approval#850
Merged
Conversation
The original text was messy and hard to follow, as well as hard to build upon. This commit does not make any substantive change, but improves the readability of this section.
frivoal
added
Agenda+
TallTed
suggested changes
Apr 15, 2024
Member
TallTed
left a comment
TallTed
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
massaging language for clarity ... and adding missing space
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
frivoal
commented
Apr 15, 2024
fantasai
reviewed
Apr 23, 2024
fantasai
reviewed
Apr 23, 2024
Co-authored-by: fantasai <[email protected]>
Member
|
The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<fantasai> Subtopic: Editorial Rewrite of Charter Approval<fantasai> github: https://github.com//pull/850 <fantasai> -> https://github.com//pull/842/files <fantasai> florian: As fantasai and I were working on revision of Charter development/review, we found the existing section to be poorly written <fantasai> ... so this is just to rewrite editorially to make easier to read and follow <fantasai> -> https://github.com//pull/850/files <fantasai> s/-> https://github.com//pull/842/files// <fantasai> s|-> https://github.com//pull/842/files|| <fantasai> plh: There are some changes to active charter that don't require AC review <fantasai> florian: That's still there, just moved it <fantasai> ... original text mixed these up a lot, so we made subsections <fantasai> fantasai: This is probably easier to review ith the text side by side rather than diff view, because we basically rewrote it <fantasai> [use the gear icon to get split view, instead of unified] <fantasai> POLL: Approve change? <fantasai> <fantasai> +1 <plh> +1 <florian_irc> +1 <TallTed> +1 <cpn> +1 <joshco> abstain <fantasai> RESOLVED: Adopt PR 850 |
css-meeting-bot
removed
the
Agenda+
frivoal
added
the
Closed: Accepted
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The original text was messy and hard to follow, as well as hard to build upon. This commit does not make any substantive change, but improves the readability of this section.
Preview | Diff