Skip to content

Type error on upsert.#885

Merged
parsonsmatt merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
matt/type-error-on-upsert
Apr 11, 2019
Merged

Type error on upsert.#885
parsonsmatt merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
matt/type-error-on-upsert

Conversation

@parsonsmatt
Copy link
Collaborator

@parsonsmatt parsonsmatt commented Apr 11, 2019

This PR introduces a few type classes that are required on upsert and related functions that have expectations on how many unique keys a record has.

Instances for these classes are generated automatically, and "failing" instances get informative "TypeError"s when you misuse them.

Fixes #868
Fixes #796


Before submitting your PR, check that you've:

After submitting your PR:

  • Update the Changelog.md file with a link to your PR
  • Check that CI passes (or if it fails, for reasons unrelated to your change, like CI timeouts)

@parsonsmatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

parsonsmatt commented Apr 11, 2019

Weird, I am getting test suite failures locally for MongoDB:

  src/Init.hs:106:32: 
  1) persistent.putMany handles conflicts by replacing old keys with new records
       expected: [Entity {entityKey = UpsertKey MongoKey {unMongoKey = 5caea9c3d4613542ae00082a}, entityVal = Upsert {upsertEmail = "putMany4", upsertAttr = "new", upsertExtra = "", upsertAge = 2}},Entity {entityKey = UpsertKey MongoKey {unMongoKey = 5caea9c3d4613542ae00082b}, entityVal = Upsert {upsertEmail = "putMany5", upsertAttr = "new", upsertExtra = "", upsertAge = 2}},Entity {entityKey = UpsertKey MongoKey {unMongoKey = 5caea7b6d46135390b00082d}, entityVal = Upsert {upsertEmail = "putMany6", upsertAttr = "new", upsertExtra = "", upsertAge = 2}},Entity {entityKey = UpsertKey MongoKey {unMongoKey = 5caea7b6d46135390b00082c}, entityVal = Upsert {upsertEmail = "putMany7", upsertAttr = "new", upsertExtra = "", upsertAge = 2}}]
        but got: [Entity {entityKey = UpsertKey MongoKey {unMongoKey = 5caea7b6d46135390b00082a}, entityVal = Upsert {upsertEmail = "putMany4", upsertAttr = "new", upsertExtra = "", upsertAge = 2}},Entity {entityKey = UpsertKey MongoKey {unMongoKey = 5caea7b6d46135390b00082b}, entityVal = Upsert {upsertEmail = "putMany5", upsertAttr = "new", upsertExtra = "", upsertAge = 2}},Entity {entityKey = UpsertKey MongoKey {unMongoKey = 5caea7b6d46135390b00082d}, entityVal = Upsert {upsertEmail = "putMany6", upsertAttr = "new", upsertExtra = "", upsertAge = 2}},Entity {entityKey = UpsertKey MongoKey {unMongoKey = 5caea7b6d46135390b00082c}, entityVal = Upsert {upsertEmail = "putMany7", upsertAttr = "new", upsertExtra = "", upsertAge = 2}}]

  To rerun use: --match "/persistent/putMany/handles conflicts by replacing old keys with new records/"

The IDs are different. I did not get these earlier when I was refactoring the test suite, and they don't appear to show up in CI?

$ "Generating Persistent entities now requires the 'UndecidableInstances' "
<> "language extension. Please enable it in your file by copy/pasting "
<> "this line into the top of your file: \n\n"
<> "{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}"
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This gives a pretty pleasant error message. The alternative is a bit nasty.


singleUniqueKey :: Q [Dec]
singleUniqueKey = do
expr <- [e|\p -> head (persistUniqueKeysP p)|]
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is safe because we have already guaranteed that there are multiple unique keys

pBlue30 <- updateGet key25 [PersonAge +=. 2]
pBlue30 @== Person "Updated" 30 Nothing

describe "putMany" $ do
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These specs are failing for MongoDB locally for me. The keys are changing, so it isn't updating, but replacing. Strange! I moved them into upsert specs which is pending for now.


singleUniqueKey :: Q [Dec]
singleUniqueKey = do
expr <- [e|\p -> head (persistUniqueKeys p)|]
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is "safe" because the generating code has already guaranteed that we have exactly one unique key.


atLeastOneKey :: Q [Dec]
atLeastOneKey = do
expr <- [e|\p -> NEL.fromList (persistUniqueKeys p)|]
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

likewise, this is safe because we have a guarantee from the generating code that it has at least one key.

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
{-# OPTIONS_GHC -fno-warn-unused-binds -fno-warn-orphans -O0 #-}
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveDataTypeable #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change requires UndecidableInstances. I give a nice error message for upgrading.

Don'tUpdateNull ->
Nothing

describe "putMany" $ do
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved from the PersistentTest module so that mongoDB could skip them for now.

-- * If the record exists (matched via it's uniqueness constraint), then update the existing record with the parameters which is passed on as list to the function.
--
-- Throws an exception if there is more than 1 uniqueness constraint.
--
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👋

@parsonsmatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Do we need to bump the major versions of the component libraries? eg persistent-mysql exports Database.Persist.Sql which has these changes. But it's interface does not change at all, and you need to depend on persistent anyway to use this stuff.

@parsonsmatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ah, dang. We can't do TypeError unless we drop support for GHC 7.10.3.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant