Double aesrand_getword() performance by using full 128 bits#801
Merged
Double aesrand_getword() performance by using full 128 bits#801
Conversation
zakird
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The AES-128 PRNG construction produces 128 bits of pseudo-randomness per AES block encryption. Use the full 128 bits instead of throwing half of the bits away.
As long as aesrand is not used for any per-packet randomness, speeding up aesrand_getword() won't matter much, so the need for this change might seem arguable. With the old version of #798 that used aesrand_getword() for every packet, this change reduced the loss of send rate by about half.