Brandon Labuschagne activity https://gitlab.com/blabuschagne 2026-03-19T20:07:22Z tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-19:5223765890 Brandon Labuschagne commented on issue #591907 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-19T20:07:22Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

Thanks for the info @ahegyi 👌

If the data lag is so short, I wonder if it's even worth displaying this in the UI 🤔 We could just document the use cases under which lag could be expected.

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-19:5221402925 Brandon Labuschagne commented on issue #591907 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-19T10:19:52Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

Yeah big thanks @rob.hunt for putting this together 👌

In terms of deprecations, we need to ensure that we have telemetry on the endpoints as this will inform the deprecation process.

The breaking change will have negligible customer impact as measured by actual product usage tracking across GitLab Self-Managed, GitLab.com, and GitLab Dedicated. For instance if it impacts less than 1% of the GitLab customer base.

@pshutsin @ahegyi surfacing the last synced at information will be helpful if done right, misleading if not. I guess we have 2 individual considerations here - that I can think of. Data synced from PG to CH (when relevant, data could be external in future cases) and materialized view refreshes. MV refreshes are supposed to happen automatically via an insert trigger (or some other CH magic) but I wonder if we need any additional data points around this i.e. refresh is delayed, failed, etc i.e. data may have synced 10 minutes ago, but the materialized view hasn't yet refreshed which could be misleading 🤷

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5218136394 Brandon Labuschagne commented on merge request !227660 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T15:09:15Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

Noooooo 😭 not at all. I'll just do this manually, thanks...

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5218124188 Brandon Labuschagne commented on merge request !227660 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T15:07:01Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

I've tried to address this using DAP, no success - after spending a lot of compute power. Let's give GitLabDuo a shot.

@GitLabDuo are you able to address the above, or do I need to pull the branch and do it manually?

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5218080361 Brandon Labuschagne commented on merge request !227660 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T14:58:28Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

For posterity: I was battling with back and fourth in this thread talking to GitLabDuo. I opened DAP and asked to fix the changes based on the thread and had much better success.

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5218064584 Brandon Labuschagne pushed to project branch duo/fix/590662-update-troubleshootjob-description-3163991 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T14:55:19Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

Brandon Labuschagne (09f0a85c) at 18 Mar 14:55

Fix spec file and refactor type file to use exclusion pattern

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5218053076 Brandon Labuschagne commented on merge request !227660 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T14:53:12Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

@GitLabDuo the spec file doesn't look correct, I think in the previously applied patch, the changes intended for the type file were applied to the spec file 🤔

We need a clean patch to correct the spec file and apply the cleaner code version to the type file.

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5218034761 Brandon Labuschagne commented on merge request !227660 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T14:49:54Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

@GitLabDuo the diff only applied to the spec file. Can you please also apply the change to the actual type file?

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5218025824 Brandon Labuschagne pushed to project branch duo/fix/590662-update-troubleshootjob-description-3163991 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T14:48:07Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

Brandon Labuschagne (06da263e) at 18 Mar 14:48

Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5218013358 Brandon Labuschagne commented on merge request !227660 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T14:45:56Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

@GitLabDuo can you please apply the above to both the type file as well as the spec file?

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5217999666 Brandon Labuschagne commented on merge request !227660 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T14:43:26Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

@GitLabDuo are we able to do the same in !227660 (diffs)?

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5217990540 Brandon Labuschagne pushed to project branch duo/fix/590662-update-troubleshootjob-description-3163991 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T14:41:42Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

Brandon Labuschagne (2db798f5) at 18 Mar 14:41

Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5217985749 Brandon Labuschagne pushed to project branch duo/fix/590662-update-troubleshootjob-description-3163991 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T14:40:45Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

Brandon Labuschagne (34efe45c) at 18 Mar 14:40

Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

tag:gitlab.com,2026-03-18:5216252186 Brandon Labuschagne commented on merge request !227660 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2026-03-18T08:35:25Z blabuschagne Brandon Labuschagne [email protected]

@adruid can you please review this duo generated MR?