Claudius Coenen activity https://gitlab.com/ccoenen 2025-11-25T09:59:52Z tag:gitlab.com,2025-11-25:4847329088 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #14116 at GitLab.org / GitLab 2025-11-25T09:59:52Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

Four months after this comment, where community interest was recognized, I find this incredibly sad once more.

tag:gitlab.com,2025-09-29:4661788088 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #2105 at KiCad / KiCad Source Code / kicad 2025-09-29T05:43:22Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

It should not need a ton of upvotes to recognize a useful feature. Having the ability to scale stuff would be useful. This is self evident by KiCad's own library - if you include several sizes of OSHW Logos, you already noticed something is missing. You just jumped to the wrong conclusion.

tag:gitlab.com,2025-07-01:4396767197 Claudius Coenen commented on epic #11247 at GitLab.org 2025-07-01T21:46:25Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

Gitlab could immensely benefit from ActivityPub IMO. It is one of the go-to code forges for open source developers but also for companies that want more control over their hosting environment. ActivityPub could have bridged those worlds. It could have been a puzzle piece in "how do we figure out federated pull requests" and stuff like that.

The main reason Github is so big, is, because Github is so big. Everyone has an account there. Contributing is relatively frictionless. On Gitlab? Well, still big, still well-established. On self-hosted Gitlab? Hell no. I'm not creating hundreds of accounts for that.

It's sad you don't see that as a priority, because to me it is the USP of Gitlab. And ActivityPub could have made it much stronger.

I somehow suspect "efforts elsewhere" will just get us yet another "hey, here's how we cram AI in another nook" things. Please don't let it be that, OK?

tag:gitlab.com,2023-11-22:2988441375 Claudius Coenen closed merge request !2: Draft: initial shape for small island at Marvin / Numberwang RC3 Assembly 2023-11-22T13:09:04Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

currently trying to add a themed entry area in shape of a tiny island.

grafik

tag:gitlab.com,2023-02-09:2398404401 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #2847 at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2023-02-09T17:15:21Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

I have no idea how this came about. I just tried getting into debugging this again, and my keyboard was recognized instantly. I am assuming that ckb-next (which I tried last time) may have updated the keyboard's firmware or something like that.

It is now running all the way back to 0.71 and of course also in the current release 0.8 / fb88964b

The relevant log lines have changed to:

[Info:] ------------------------------------------------------
[Info:] |               Detecting HID devices                |
[Info:] ------------------------------------------------------
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0004 P=0xFFC2 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [Corsair K70 LUX] is enabled
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device opened. VID/PID 1B1C:1B36
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device type C0
[Info:] [Corsair K70 LUX] Registering RGB controller
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling device list change callbacks.
[Verbose:] [Corsair K70 LUX] successfully added
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0001 P=0x000C I=0] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0002 P=0xFFC0 I=0] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0003 P=0xFFC2 I=0] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0006 P=0x0001 I=0] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
tag:gitlab.com,2023-02-09:2398404349 Claudius Coenen closed issue #2847: Corsair K70 LUX detected but not initialized at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2023-02-09T17:15:20Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

Description of Bug

#1124 and !1467 added support for the Corsair K70 LUX keyboards (not RGB!). With the most-recent master build (4d4c18f1 at the time of writing) my keyboard does not show up, though. The log says [Corsair peripheral] Device type 00, Device type is unknown and finally [Corsair K70 LUX] is not initialized.

Attached Log

Here are the relevant parts from the log:

[Info:] ------------------------------------------------------
[Info:] |               Detecting HID devices                |
[Info:] ------------------------------------------------------
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0002 P=0xFFC0 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0003 P=0xFFC2 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [Corsair K70 LUX] is enabled
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device opened. VID/PID 1B1C:1B36
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device type 00
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device type is unknown
[Info:] [Corsair K70 LUX] is not initialized
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0006 P=0x0001 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0006 P=0x0001 I=0] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0001 P=0x000C I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0004 P=0xFFC2 I=2] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.

Operating System

OS - Windows Windows 11 / 22H2. Yes, I did run the program once with administrative privileges.

Hardware Configuration

Nothing out of the ordinary, I pretty much only have this keyboard.

tag:gitlab.com,2023-01-22:2359167338 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #2847 at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2023-01-22T23:30:25Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

I have confirmed that the keyboard works under Linux with ckb-next.

tag:gitlab.com,2023-01-22:2359143667 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #2847 at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2023-01-22T22:31:05Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

I tried changing this line to 0x00 just to see what happens. The keyboard then shows up in the devices list, but I can't change any LED lights.

tag:gitlab.com,2022-12-23:2309580169 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #2847 at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2022-12-23T09:01:01Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

This is still the case in release 0.8

tag:gitlab.com,2022-10-29:2201985727 Claudius Coenen opened issue #2847: Corsair K70 LUX detected but not initialized at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2022-10-29T21:38:47Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

Description of Bug

#1124 and !1467 added support for the Corsair K70 LUX keyboards (not RGB!). With the most-recent master build (4d4c18f1 at the time of writing) my keyboard does not show up, though. The log says [Corsair peripheral] Device type 00, Device type is unknown and finally [Corsair K70 LUX] is not initialized.

Attached Log

Here are the relevant parts from the log:

[Info:] ------------------------------------------------------
[Info:] |               Detecting HID devices                |
[Info:] ------------------------------------------------------
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0002 P=0xFFC0 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0003 P=0xFFC2 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [Corsair K70 LUX] is enabled
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device opened. VID/PID 1B1C:1B36
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device type 00
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device type is unknown
[Info:] [Corsair K70 LUX] is not initialized
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0006 P=0x0001 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0006 P=0x0001 I=0] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0001 P=0x000C I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0004 P=0xFFC2 I=2] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.

Operating System

OS - Windows Windows 11 / 22H2. Yes, I did run the program once with administrative privileges.

Hardware Configuration

Nothing out of the ordinary, I pretty much only have this keyboard.

tag:gitlab.com,2022-10-26:2195315374 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #1124 at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2022-10-26T12:30:49Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

I also tried with this artifact: https://gitlab.com/CalcProgrammer1/OpenRGB/-/jobs/3220614068 but it gives me the same Device Type 00 is unknown /// Device is not initialized - how would this be initialized?

tag:gitlab.com,2022-10-26:2195287259 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #1124 at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2022-10-26T12:21:30Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

this is the log output:

....
[Info:] ------------------------------------------------------
[Info:] |               Detecting HID devices                |
[Info:] ------------------------------------------------------
[Debug:] [0451:82FF U=0001 P=0xFFB0 I=-1]                           - 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0002 P=0xFFC0 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0003 P=0xFFC2 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [Corsair K70 LUX] is enabled
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device opened. VID/PID 1B1C:1B36
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device type 00
[Debug:] [Corsair peripheral] Device type is unknown
[Info:] [Corsair K70 LUX] is not initialized
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0006 P=0x0001 I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
...
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0006 P=0x0001 I=0] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
...
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0001 P=0x000C I=1] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
...
[Debug:] [1B1C:1B36 U=0004 P=0xFFC2 I=2] Corsair                   - Corsair Gaming K70 LUX Keyboard 
[Trace:] [ResourceManager] Calling detection progress callbacks.
...
tag:gitlab.com,2022-10-26:2195272490 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #1124 at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2022-10-26T12:16:17Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

(yes I did start once with administrative privileges)

tag:gitlab.com,2022-10-26:2195271740 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #1124 at Adam Honse / OpenRGB 2022-10-26T12:15:58Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

It shows up in the list of supported devices, and the "scan for devices" bar at the bottom shows the name for a split second, but I don't get it into the devices list (only entry here is my mainboard). grafik grafik

Tested with artifact from https://gitlab.com/CalcProgrammer1/OpenRGB/-/pipelines/676861798 on windows 11.

tag:gitlab.com,2022-07-03:1977718990 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #408 at Glax / Glaxnimate 2022-07-03T14:20:15Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

from the logs, I think this is built using qt 5.15.3-1, and I've seen similar bug reports here: https://forum.qt.io/topic/124947/error-running-windeployqt/9 - there it is suggested that later versions (5.15.4+ or 6.10+) might have this one fixed.

I have pretty much zero experience with qt, so please take it with a huge grain of salt.

(edit: i removed the second link, I am not certain that it was not applicable to this problem)

tag:gitlab.com,2022-07-03:1977588895 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #408 at Glax / Glaxnimate 2022-07-03T09:50:11Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

This is marked as closed, but the most-recent nightly for windows is from four months ago (commit 30c8df58). Would it be possible to request a newer nightly so I can test if this fixes the problem for me?

I have a very similar problem with text objects, but I am not at any screen scale (I'm using the default 100% on windows). I would like to try if this is now fixed or if I should raise a different issue.

tag:gitlab.com,2022-06-05:1925372499 Claudius Coenen commented on issue #2418 at F-Droid / Client 2022-06-05T21:50:45Z ccoenen Claudius Coenen

It is an issue common enough that I think it should have a formal way of addressing it.

Updating the description would mean that every app might handle this slightly differently. Ultimately this is something I would like to be able to filter while searching. I usually don't want to start using new apps that are abandoned already (continuing to use abandoned apps is fine; taking them up is not).

NoSourceSince seems to have different semantics attached to it. But I might be wrong.

I did not know an Archive repo existed, but it does not apply to the four examples given above - all of them seem to be in working condition.