So, I noticed....
That's in a 30-day window. 447,000 queries is kind of a lot.
Can we cache this, and possibly serve it from our CDN?
Works for me! Thanks!
This issue makes more sense when I don't leave a key word out of the title
This section could turn into a graphical table, with the list headings turned into columns. I tried it with a Markdown table and that looked terrible.
I'm working on
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/draft-stratgey-2028-update-council-hackfest-report/146348
to be posted... like, next week sometime. It would be nice to intersperse some graphics, and maybe, like, some graphical tables
Blog post is wall of text.
mattdm
next week-ish?
Everyone!
Not vital, and I should have thought of the idea sooner. But it'd be nice!
I would like to remind everyone that Fedora is a big project, largely comprised of volunteers. There are a lot of things going on at once. We can't always make decisions instantly, and reporting an issue to one special interest group isn't raising it with the whole project. It's not really fair to assume that we're not interested in a reasonable discussion, and it seems very quick to jump to nuclear-level threats. Could we please deescalate the drama? I'm sure everyone wants what's best for both projects and for our users.
@josephgayoso Yes, legal is okay with it. Actually, they're waiting for these brand guidelines.
Okay, I have the answer:
It's okay to use the palette being used, but the logos should not be the exact same color, so that we can differentiate them and lessen the likelihood of confusion between the Fedora trademark and the Fedora Remix mark.
Related to fedora/design/team/requests#66 (closed)
Related to: fedora/design/team/logos/misc#1 (closed)
I know the original Remix colors were intentionally different from the Fedora brand colors. Let me check with legal if they still have a preference. (Don't let this halt progress, though!)
I think there's three things, really:
I'd like to raise the priority on this one, as part of our overall trademark guidelines update. Thanks!
Here is my script which mirrors badges.fedoraproject.org badges to discussion.fedoraproject.org. It takes a username, and creates the badges on the discourse side if needed.
https://pagure.io/badgebot/blob/8cf4be5d8a473c38d42ca60681ccfd6f3edb3a0c/f/badgemirror.py
Even if we keep a separate badges front-end application, I'd like to continue this (and in fact, enable it for everyone).
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Business_cards is out of date. As I understand it, the actual tool should work with the new logo (it currently just crashes, but that's another issue). Could you make an updated version of this page on the docs site, with the new logo, and then redirect the existing page? Thanks!
Thanks!
Me, I guess. And gbcox (FAS)
Not urgent
Anyone who wants a Fedora business card.
Also it looks bad now.
If one goes to https://pagure.io/mindshare, it's clear that that repo is No Longer The Place.
However, if you land at https://pagure.io/mindshare/issues from a bookmark, link somewhere, or web search, it's not at all apparent.
All of the issues from that tracker should be migrated if they're not already, and issue-tracking disabled for the project.
Should I file an infra ticket for this?
So, I noticed....
That's in a 30-day window. 447,000 queries is kind of a lot.
Can we cache this, and possibly serve it from our CDN?