@mikolaj_wawrzyniak - I was wondering if you can help us with maintainer review on this MR, please?
Thanks @marcel.amirault - I applied the suggestion. It makes sense to me.
Rajendra Kadam (5c7e059f) at 18 Mar 06:11
Improve documentation
Hi @marcel.amirault and @sasharma13 - I have made some improvements, applied Marcel's suggestions. I think it's ready for another round of review. Please let me know if I missed anything from all the threads. I replied to some open discussions too.
Thanks!
Rajendra Kadam (811d6503) at 18 Mar 05:31
Add feature flag note and beta documentation for Pipeline Builder
Rajendra Kadam (f3b70a01) at 18 Mar 05:13
fix: rename pipeline builder agent reference in Dockerfile
@dhershkovitch @veethika - Do we have any avatar png built for Pipeline Builder Agent?
Rajendra Kadam (1141cdb6) at 18 Mar 04:54
Rename pipeline_authoring reference to pipeline_builder
Contributes to #239356
If this MR contains changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods and other items described in the security review guidelines:
@gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec
Hello @mikolaj_wawrzyniak
I renamed the agent reference in Dockerfile. Please take a look.
Thanks!
Renames the already added agent reference in Dockerfile.
Monolith MR for this agent to be added as foundational agent - gitlab-org/gitlab!221852
NA
Rajendra Kadam (710c87dd) at 18 Mar 04:41
Rename pipeline builder agent reference
Like the name. I renamed the agent in https://gitlab.com/explore/ai-catalog/agents/1004583/ to Pipeline Builder
Renamed to pipeline_builder.md
We will be collating the best practices as mentioned by Manu in comment !221852 (comment 3166144003) that will be then fed to the LLM in consumable format (non-html).
We may rename it to pipeline_builder probably. So I can raise another MR with the reference change?
Thanks for merging this @mikolaj_wawrzyniak
In gitlab-org/gitlab!221852 we renamed the reference to be ai_pipeline_builder. I assume we need to change it here too right? We have a few agents that we built to test various prompt combinations.
I hope there is no regression on production because of the name change?
Thanks!
Rajendra Kadam (9a3baef4) at 17 Mar 10:48
Improve documentation
Unassigning myself as I am not sure if we will schedule this as this can be a breaking change, we will need to move cautiously ahead with data to approve the breaking change.