Tobias Stoeckmann activity https://gitlab.com/stoeckmann 2024-10-02T11:35:28Z tag:gitlab.com,2024-10-02:3695901795 Tobias Stoeckmann deleted project branch lvmdbusd at Tobias Stoeckmann / lvm2 2024-10-02T11:35:28Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

Tobias Stoeckmann (493d8908) at 02 Oct 11:35

tag:gitlab.com,2024-09-13:3641409045 Tobias Stoeckmann opened merge request !15: Fix typos at LVM team / lvm2 2024-09-13T16:36:52Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

Typos found with codespell.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

tag:gitlab.com,2024-09-13:3641408470 Tobias Stoeckmann opened merge request !14: lvmdbusd: Fix Python script at LVM team / lvm2 2024-09-13T16:36:34Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

The thread does not contain field "damon" but "daemon".

Actually found with codespell.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

tag:gitlab.com,2024-09-13:3641407310 Tobias Stoeckmann pushed new project branch lvmdbusd at Tobias Stoeckmann / lvm2 2024-09-13T16:35:58Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

Tobias Stoeckmann (4220f141) at 13 Sep 16:35

lvmdbusd: Fix Python script

tag:gitlab.com,2024-09-13:3641405527 Tobias Stoeckmann pushed new project branch typos at Tobias Stoeckmann / lvm2 2024-09-13T16:35:00Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

Tobias Stoeckmann (045f58df) at 13 Sep 16:35

Fix typos

tag:gitlab.com,2024-09-13:3641401655 Tobias Stoeckmann created project Tobias Stoeckmann / lvm2 2024-09-13T16:32:54Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected] tag:gitlab.com,2020-09-05:894912920 Tobias Stoeckmann created project Tobias Stoeckmann / psmisc 2020-09-05T11:07:02Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected] tag:gitlab.com,2020-08-24:879490606 Tobias Stoeckmann deleted project branch faq at Tobias Stoeckmann / cryptsetup 2020-08-24T17:37:58Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

Tobias Stoeckmann (ba4c028f) at 24 Aug 17:37

tag:gitlab.com,2020-08-24:879488357 Tobias Stoeckmann deleted project branch segments at Tobias Stoeckmann / cryptsetup 2020-08-24T17:35:38Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

Tobias Stoeckmann (52f5cb8c) at 24 Aug 17:35

tag:gitlab.com,2020-08-24:879478986 Tobias Stoeckmann opened merge request !102: Check segment gaps regardless of heap space. at cryptsetup / cryptsetup 2020-08-24T17:26:17Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

Segments are validated in hdr_validate_segments. Gaps in segment keys are detected when collecting offsets. But if an invalid segment is very large, larger than count, it could happen that cryptsetup is unable to allocate enough memory, not giving a clue about what actually is the problem.

Therefore check for gaps even if not enough memory is available. This gives much more information with debug output enabled.

Obviously cryptsetup still fails if segments are perfectly fine but not enough RAM available. But at that stage, the user knows that it's the fault of the system, not of an invalid segment.

tag:gitlab.com,2020-08-24:879477239 Tobias Stoeckmann opened merge request !101: Fixed some typos. at cryptsetup / cryptsetup 2020-08-24T17:24:37Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

The large text block happened due to reformat. It's just addition of "the" in front of problem, i.e. "If this is the problem, ..."

tag:gitlab.com,2020-08-24:879476140 Tobias Stoeckmann pushed new project branch faq at Tobias Stoeckmann / cryptsetup 2020-08-24T17:23:38Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

Tobias Stoeckmann (4bb85dfa) at 24 Aug 17:23

Fixed some typos.

tag:gitlab.com,2020-08-24:879475707 Tobias Stoeckmann pushed new project branch segments at Tobias Stoeckmann / cryptsetup 2020-08-24T17:23:14Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

Tobias Stoeckmann (61882ae8) at 24 Aug 17:23

Check segment gaps regardless of heap space.

tag:gitlab.com,2020-08-16:869332093 Tobias Stoeckmann created project Tobias Stoeckmann / cryptsetup 2020-08-16T08:09:17Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected] tag:gitlab.com,2020-08-16:869332017 Tobias Stoeckmann closed merge request !94: sysctl: better failure ignoring at procps-ng / procps 2020-08-16T08:09:02Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

The failure ignoring option "-" is treated after name check. Therefore, an empty name is not detected.

If you use "-=value", the name will be seen as "-". Moving the failure ignoring check in front of the name check solves the problem.

tag:gitlab.com,2019-12-27:602688588 Tobias Stoeckmann opened merge request !94: sysctl: better failure ignoring at procps-ng / procps 2019-12-27T12:56:19Z stoeckmann Tobias Stoeckmann [email protected]

The failure ignoring option "-" is treated after name check. Therefore, an empty name is not detected.

If you use "-=value", the name will be seen as "-". Moving the failure ignoring check in front of the name check solves the problem.