Comments for JavaScript, JavaScript…

Comment on Understanding JavaScript Prototypes. by Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 06 Apr 2016 19:07:39 +0000

It should be more clearly stated in the beginning of the text how the structure of a construction function and an object looks like, e.g. an object has a.__proto__ whereas the function A

Comment on Of Classes and Arrow Functions (a cautionary tale) by Tony Brown

Tony Brown — Thu, 12 Nov 2015 14:31:51 +0000

Great post Angus!

Comment on Of Classes and Arrow Functions (a cautionary tale) by Angus Croll

Angus Croll — Thu, 05 Nov 2015 03:12:28 +0000

In reply to MrOrz.

Not seeing your point. Whatever is on the right hand side of the class property should be on the right hand side of the “in effect” section.

Comment on Of Classes and Arrow Functions (a cautionary tale) by MrOrz

MrOrz — Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:50:50 +0000

In the code example that comes right after the sentence “In effect, class properties work like this”, the class properties should be normal functions instead of arrow functions. Otherwise, we would not need to bind() in the first code example in the section “Arrow functions and classes”.

Comment on Of Classes and Arrow Functions (a cautionary tale) by Angus Croll

Angus Croll — Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:49:15 +0000

In reply to martinrinehart.

Should be there now

Comment on Of Classes and Arrow Functions (a cautionary tale) by martinrinehart

martinrinehart — Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:14:49 +0000

Page not found.

Comment on JavaScript Fat City by Arrow Functions “gotcha” | Web and more

Arrow Functions “gotcha” | Web and more — Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:31:49 +0000

[…] Learn more about fat-arrows: http://toddmotto.com/es6-arrow-functions-syntaxes-and-lexical-scoping/ http://www.nczonline.net/blog/2013/09/10/understanding-ecmascript-6-arrow-functions/ http://javascriptplayground.com/blog/2014/04/real-life-es6-arrow-fn/ http://www.2ality.com/2012/04/arrow-functions.html https://javascriptweblog.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/javascript-fat-city/ […]

Comment on JavaScript Fat City by greim

greim — Fri, 05 Jun 2015 03:07:06 +0000

> if a fat arrow is used to define a method in an object literal it will continue to be bound to that object even when invoked from a borrowing object

Wouldn’t it be bound to the `this` of the same scope the object literal was created in, rather than being bound to the object literal itself? Or did I miss something with the latest proposal?

Comment on Extending JavaScript Natives by srikanth ganta

srikanth ganta — Wed, 06 May 2015 12:09:53 +0000

Reblogged this on Srikanth's Blog.

Comment on Fixing the JavaScript typeof operator by Using and Abusing UnderscoreJs | Zsolt Nagy

Using and Abusing UnderscoreJs | Zsolt Nagy — Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:35:06 +0000

[…] Fixing the typeof operator has been a concern for a while. Underscore gives you a more consistent approach which does not let you get away with checking undeclared types anymore. […]