Comments on: Facebook McAfee https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/ Unlucky in Cards Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:15:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0-alpha-61516 By: Henry VIII https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-567629 Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:15:49 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-567629 To all readers having the ‘Secure Your Account’ message:

Delete your cookies and browsing history. This should allow you to log in to your Facebook without having an unsolicited and possibly harmful product forced upon you.

This is a shoddy way to do business and a horrible way to work with the users who have taken every measure to ensure that their machine is not infected by a virus except to use Facebook’s partner product. No where in the 5 steps does Facebook offer an alternative to their partner product. This can only mean that Facebook is completely disinterested in your wants and is only interested in pushing their partner product – MacAfee. This makes Facebook no better than the shady websites that tell you you have a virus and try to trick an unwary user into downloading malicious software.

What massive hypocrites!

“6 months free subscription”? Seriously, who do they think they’re kidding with that?!
What happens at the end of the 6 months? Are we then going to have to pay for a McAfee subscription in order to use Facebook?
How stupid do they think we are?

They know people wont pay to use Facebook. Not when there are similar sites out there that don’t charge their users. So they are using this sort of underhanded tactic to make more money from us.
Don’t they make enough from all the targeted advertising?

Facebook seems to have forgotten how fickle internet trends can be.
We, the users, are the reason Facebook has become the business giant it is.
Remember Myspace guys, and learn the lessons from their mistakes.
The next social networking site confined to the annals of history could be you!

]]>
By: DJ Floyd https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-567486 Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:57:17 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-567486 I was actually forbidden access to FB on this computer unless I downloaded their free McAfee software. I got a notice the I had malware on my computer and wouldn’t be allowed to proceed. Funny thing is, after running they’re “free” software, it came back that I did NOT have any viruses. I use the MS security software and run scans regularly. I do not want or need McAfee. Can I remove it and still access FB?

]]>
By: patty https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-539745 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:19:49 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-539745 They are forcing people to use this and cant sign on to fb without it

]]>
By: Jack B https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-475139 Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:41:46 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-475139 I find this a little scary. There is so much spyware and PC highjacking that you have to run Antivirus software on you local machine to access a website…

]]>
By: Uttoran Sen https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-475129 Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:26:02 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-475129 Yep, i remember those google pack days, i promoted it and even earned some money 😛

Am currently using macafee on my dell powered by windows7 and its pretty good so far, and if they are giving a 6 months free license, i don’t see any reason why one should not grab it 🙂

]]>
By: Sean https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-475090 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:55:44 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-475090 Facebook has just recently been able to turn a profit, so anyway that they can make more money, I’d think they would definitely try to capitalize on it.

]]>
By: Adney https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-475076 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:50:01 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-475076 In reply to Roman Sheydvasser.

I agree with you. Mcafee work very well in partnership with Microsoft before. Now they want work with FB. WTS

]]>
By: Adney https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-475075 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:41:46 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-475075 In reply to Weiran Zhang.

Avira used less memory than Microsoft Essential.

]]>
By: Chip Bennett https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-475002 Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:52:58 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-475002 And of course, the real kicker is, AV does *absolutely nothing* to prevent phishing and other social-engineering attacks.

Will this move prevent Koobface (and other malware) from spreading? Possibly.

Will this move correct ignorant/stupid user behavior that represents the greatest attack vector? Not at all.

]]>
By: Medisoft https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-475001 Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:14:52 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-475001 We’re actually switching from Symantec to McAfee anti-virus at our fortune 500 company this year.

]]>
By: ryanve https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474991 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:45:39 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474991 I think you’re right. It’s not about security—it’s about scaring people and making them think they’re getting a deal, when actually they are getting scammed. It drives me crazy that PC’s come packaged with trial software like McAfee when there are several excellent free antivirus programs. The hacked FB users could be better addressed by an educational page about phishing and other common security issues.

]]>
By: 113Tidbits https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474799 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:07:11 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474799 This is awesome news!! Oh, thank you great Facebook deities.

]]>
By: Nicolas https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474783 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:27:46 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474783 I have to use a McAfee product on my work machine but started to use the free MS solution on the virtual Windows7 machine on my Mac. I think it’s doing a good job and more than enough for the price of free.

]]>
By: John https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474778 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:46:45 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474778 In reply to Weiran Zhang.

I’m using MSE and it gets the job done nicely without using up a lot of system resources.

]]>
By: Ken Nelan https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474771 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:08:24 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474771 In reply to Jared.

I’ve been running Avast for over 4 years now, and I’ve never seen a nag. I have to re-register every 14 months, but I think that’s fair given that it’s free and takes up so much less resources than Norton or McAfee!

Course, I run linux on my main box now so it’s only an issue on my laptop…

]]>
By: links for 2010-01-13 | GFMorris.com https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474768 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:30:28 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474768 […] Facebook McAfee — Matt Mullenweg “Modern versions of Windows include free tools like Defender which are just as good and appear to have less of a performance impact on the computer. But if they really wanted to have a long-term impact on desktop as a vector for attack on web services I’m surprised they didn’t start, sponsor, or promote an Open Source equivalent of McAfee. This seems like a space very well-suited to address with an OS tool in the digital commons, much like a Windows anti-spyware equivalent of SpamAssassin, with self-updating rules and a completely transparent process.” Exactly (tags: opensource Facebook anti_virus) […]

]]>
By: Micah Carlson https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474759 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:30:22 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474759 In reply to Mark Mathson.

I feel you, but I think this would be a bad deal for the users.

It would require an unthinkable amout of bandwidth (on FB’s side) and personal security concerns on the user’s side.

JavaScript can be incredibly intrusive if you know how to write it, while at the same time it would make the rest of the user’s “life” that they have decided not to broadcast on FB more accessible to the site.

I’m not sure if you know this, but the guys over there are insanely smart. They have the ability to place ads specifically based on particular profiles.

The best thing to do is to get up and running with a solid established antivi; or switch to a Mac. And no, I don’t work for Mac.

]]>
By: Joseph Scott https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474758 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:49:43 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474758 There’s ClamWin – http://www.clamwin.com/

It doesn’t do everything that the top notch Windows Anti-Virus programs do, but it’s free and open source.

]]>
By: David https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474757 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:37:00 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474757 Obviously, we all know that McAfee has a deal with Facebook.

Stunts like this and slowly whittling away your privacy is the direction Facebook is going towards. You can expect to see more of this as the investors who have pumped millions of dollars into the company dial up the pressure.

I think a lot of people aren’t coming to grips with the fact that Facebook is no longer an “innocent little startup with naive college-aged programmers at the helm”. The name of the game is money and the facebook you all knew and loved is long gone.

]]>
By: Viper007Bond https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474756 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:32:55 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474756 In reply to Weiran Zhang.

I run this and it’s quite good. It also replaces Defender.

]]>
By: Josiah https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474754 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:03:46 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474754 “MS Security Essentials” is just a generally hilarious title.

]]>
By: Mark Mathson https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474752 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:21:50 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474752 I find this interesting as well Matt. One thought I’ve had is how much more useful it would be to have a online “cloud based” security scanner that the Facebook users could use. I’m thinking along the lines of what Panda Security has with their cloud protection. (As much as I hate throwing the word cloud around)

Not to mention though, that they should be promoting browser security on the same token. Such as, notifying user of an outdated, vulnerable version of their browser, and suggestion they update.

]]>
By: Matt https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474751 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:17:08 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474751 In reply to Micah Carlson.

I haven’t been through the process myself, as my account hasn’t been hacked, but it looks vaguely like that from the screenshots. Maybe someone from Facebook will drop by and clarify.

]]>
By: Zim https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474750 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:15:02 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474750 I would accept it if I had the choice to run any antivirus. I think they are forcing users over something they shouldn’t…

]]>
By: Micah Carlson https://ma.tt/2010/01/facebook-mcafee/#comment-474749 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:14:02 +0000 http://ma.tt/?p=33561#comment-474749 Huge deal. Mark and the team at FB are almost definitely under contract with McAfee, but what about the people on Macs? Are they exempt from this? I’m sure they, of course, categorize OS for each of their users, but it will be interesting to see if they are going to “force” this on everyone, regardless of how well their computers are naturally protected.

Don’t get me wrong. I love McAfee. I was fortunate enough to receive a premium membership free through my job and haven’t had a single problem since.

I think it should be a “free option” for the users who had their accounts phished, but it should NEVER be mandatory.

Just a thought.

]]>