Comments for Quantum Computing Report

Comment on China Open-Sources “Origin Pilot”: The First Domestically Developed Quantum OS by Raja Ramsay

Raja Ramsay — Sun, 08 Mar 2026 14:02:06 +0000

How do I download it I would like to test it out

Comment on Comcast, Classiq, and AMD Demonstrate Quantum-Optimized Internet Resilience by Kris

Kris — Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:51:05 +0000

Interesting in deed

Comment on The “Science Project” Era is Over. Report to US Congress Calls for a “Quantum First” 2030 Goal by Ravi Singh

Ravi Singh — Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:15:11 +0000

Thanks for sharing this—very helpful!

Comment on Palo Alto Networks Introduces PAN-OS 12.1 Orion with Post-Quantum Cryptography Features by desain

desain — Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:11:01 +0000

how effectively these solutions can be adopted across enterprises with diverse legacy systems and varying readiness levels.

Comment on “Quantum Advantage” Means Different Things to Quantum Scientists and End Users by Privacy Preferred Please

Privacy Preferred Please — Wed, 20 Aug 2025 17:36:19 +0000

This is 100% correct.

Comment on Xanadu and HyperLight Advance Photonic Chips for Quantum Computing with New Performance Metrics by David Oker

David Oker — Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:13:24 +0000

I’m thinking this is the last step for the photonic qubit Quantum Computers to make Quantum Computers work. They should be able to make a fully operational Quantum Computer as fast as they can build it?

Comment on Here is What’s Missing from All Those Quantum Roadmaps by Zeno

Zeno — Sun, 13 Jul 2025 14:19:56 +0000

Perhaps one should also look at the history of Modern Computing where not everything was hardware technology. I am afraid that too much lobbying by the huge world-wide community of Physicists does not give a lucid way of prospecting the future of quantum computing. I am currently reading “A Histrory of Modern Computing” by Paul E. Cerruzzi which is very instructive and could inspire some of the way we envision the roadmaps.

Comment on D-Wave Proposes Quantum Blockchain Architecture Using Distributed Annealing Quantum Computers by Donn Michael Silberman

Donn Michael Silberman — Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:28:36 +0000

Once again, Quantum Computing Reports lets me know about an excellent announcement. This one (to this readers mind) describes some progress in protecting information secured by blockchain technology; and save energy too. Thank you, Doug and the Team, at QCR.

Comment on Microsoft Announces Development of Its First Operational Topological Qubit Device by dougfinke

dougfinke — Sun, 23 Feb 2025 21:06:33 +0000

In reply to Satyavolu S. Papa Rao.

As one might expect, Microsoft is keeping certain details of their manufacturing process proprietary for competitive reasons. But here’s what we do know. Microsoft is not currently using a commercial CMOS fab for fabrication such as GlobalFoundries or others. The processing is all performed in their own facilities. The MBE is currently processed at their Quantum Materials Laboratory in Copenhagen, Denmark with additional module construction in Redmond. You can see an announcement from them at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/quantum/2018/10/09/accelerating-quantum-materials-research-with-microsofts-new-copenhagen-lab/. They have been working on optimizing this process for many years. For example, we note that a few years ago, they were trying to use InSb for one of the layers in the stack, but now they are using InAs.

Comment on Microsoft Announces Development of Its First Operational Topological Qubit Device by Satyavolu S. Papa Rao

Satyavolu S. Papa Rao — Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:50:49 +0000

I am curious as to the defectivity rates in MBE fabricated structures … Have they been assessed (using defect detection tools standard in CMOS fab, say) and are they already at the level required for the million qubits on one chip? If not, how many orders of magnitude remain to get to 0.01/cm2, say?