Comments for @rameerez https://rameerez.com/ Maker of PromptHero, Jobician, Hustl, and more Sat, 07 Feb 2026 13:52:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.1 Comment on How to choose a domain name: my experience after buying dozens of domains for 15+ years by Zlatko https://rameerez.com/how-to-choose-domain-name/#comment-19706 Thu, 04 Dec 2025 12:06:29 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=4388#comment-19706 That was a truly insightful read, Rameerez. It makes me all the more convinced that I chose the right name for my side project.

]]>
Comment on Send this article to your friend who still thinks the cloud is a good idea by Piotr https://rameerez.com/send-this-article-to-your-friend-who-still-thinks-the-cloud-is-a-good-idea/#comment-19705 Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:32:44 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=5940#comment-19705 Thanks a lot for this article.

My few cents: one of the things that I like with running your app on your own machines is that in the worst case scenario, when you’ll make a mistake, a bug, and your app starts to consume 100% CPU and RAM – it will be localized to your servers only.

Compare it to big cloud providers where you pay-as-you-go without the means to put a real hard-cap for your expenses. None of them provide you with that, saying either it’s impossible or “you don’t want to turn your customers down because you hit some peak in popularity, right?”.

So, you create all those auto-scaling solutions that will add new machines, configure them on some LoadBalancer to deal with higher memory and CPU consumption.

By the time you realize there was some bug in your app you could already see that you just added a thousands of dollars to your bill.

They might cancel your bill after you’ll reach them.
Or they might not.
One more dependency on a good will of a cloud provider.

You don’t have any such concerns while running it on your own servers.

]]>
Comment on Send this article to your friend who still thinks the cloud is a good idea by John https://rameerez.com/send-this-article-to-your-friend-who-still-thinks-the-cloud-is-a-good-idea/#comment-19704 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 14:36:39 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=5940#comment-19704 I’ve been in the industry and worked extensively in both worlds, the world before the cloud and the world after the cloud. I work for a major cloud provider. I agree with your assessment that some people are too dogmatic one way or the other. My belief is that there’s a future where connectivity is so good that you run what is economical to run in the cloud in the cloud and run what is economical to run in a self-managed setup in a self-managed setup. The premise of using cloud services is where you can derive value from removing undifferentiated heavy lifting. Back in the old days I used to run my own DNS servers and my own e-mail servers. Nobody does that anymore. And your write-up here completely ignores the fact that cloud object storage is a good deal, and I’d be surprised if you’re not using it yourself for backups. What you’re really talking about here is that cloud compute and cloud managed database is expensive. But anyway – here’s a crack at a rational argument for you. If you’re a one person entrepreneur trying to incubate an idea, why would you waste time on configuring operating systems and software? I can deploy and test in the cloud and then tear it all down. Stand it back up when I need it. That’s what Terraform is for. I can’t terraform away 169 Euros per server. And if I have a good business idea then the ROI is going to dwarf my piddly startup cloud bill.

I agree with a lot of what you said here, because if you’re going to run servers for 730 hours per month, why not get as low as you can, it just makes financial sense. The tradeoffs can be done very simply in a spreadsheet.

]]>
Comment on How I exited the cloud by Andrej https://rameerez.com/how-i-exited-the-cloud/#comment-19703 Sat, 08 Nov 2025 17:34:19 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=5921#comment-19703 One server works if you can afford some downtime. Servers and disks do fail and it takes providers some time to restore service.

I hope that you have ensured that RAID, ZFS or other disk redundancy method is set up.

]]>
Comment on Send this article to your friend who still thinks the cloud is a good idea by wheresalice https://rameerez.com/send-this-article-to-your-friend-who-still-thinks-the-cloud-is-a-good-idea/#comment-19702 Thu, 06 Nov 2025 08:42:34 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=5940#comment-19702 It’s hard to argue that Cloudflare isn’t the cloud when it literally has cloud in its name. But otherwise yes, fully agree there’s little actual value from big cloud providers. The perceived value is because people have had bad experiences with poorly-managed on-premise infrastructure, and ironically that’s often because they weren’t given enough budget

]]>
Comment on Send this article to your friend who still thinks the cloud is a good idea by Luke Cavanagh https://rameerez.com/send-this-article-to-your-friend-who-still-thinks-the-cloud-is-a-good-idea/#comment-19701 Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:13:24 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=5940#comment-19701 Hetzner is very solid for a solid VPS hosting provider.

]]>
Comment on Send this article to your friend who still thinks the cloud is a good idea by Iñigo https://rameerez.com/send-this-article-to-your-friend-who-still-thinks-the-cloud-is-a-good-idea/#comment-19700 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 15:52:59 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=5940#comment-19700 In reply to Agent Cyberis.

I worked for a telco company for more than 15 years and we always wondered *how* it was possible that AWS could charge you so much money for traffic.

Transit is actually *really* cheap.

Telcos will either charge you for line capacity, or for a direct peering connection a percentile 95 of the traffic you’re injecting.

AWS, Google, etc. charge you for byte transferred, which is much more.

It’s not just the hardware. Everything comes with an extremelly high price attached.

]]>
Comment on How I exited the cloud by Ryan C. https://rameerez.com/how-i-exited-the-cloud/#comment-19698 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 07:09:41 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=5921#comment-19698 Hey thanks for posting this! Just curious: do you think you could do cheaper still without the pain by running an on-Prem purchased server at your house, and then using some reverse proxy server or an overlay networking solution that can get around residential ISP CGNAT?

]]>
Comment on Send this article to your friend who still thinks the cloud is a good idea by Agent Cyberis https://rameerez.com/send-this-article-to-your-friend-who-still-thinks-the-cloud-is-a-good-idea/#comment-19696 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 03:15:36 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=5940#comment-19696 I celebrated 50 years in everything automated last July. Started writing Fortran on a teletype connected to a Univac over an acoustic modem. Most of my experience is building the hardware and software. Great experience. I’ve noticed lots of ebb and flow. Large centralized resources and dumb terminals at the edge, then distributed computing, then decentralized capability at the edge, and back. I’m glad companies are beginning to re-patriate their computing to on prem, or colo based hardware. The cloud might be fine to rapidly prototype something, but someone’s got to pay for those billion dollar, gigawatt datacenters and it isn’t AWS/GCP/Azure; it’s their cash cow customers. I never liked being milked. Besides, spinning up your own server(s) is cool.

]]>
Comment on Kamal’s missing tutorial – how to deploy a Rails 8 app with Postgres to your VPS by YiSheng Lee https://rameerez.com/kamal-tutorial-how-to-deploy-a-postgresql-rails-app/#comment-19694 Thu, 02 Oct 2025 23:54:28 +0000 https://rameerez.com/?p=6097#comment-19694 Hello, thanks for the guide, it is very well written. I am trying to deploy a simple rails app in DigitalOcean Droplet, and I do not have a host, what should I filled in here

proxy:
ssl: false
host: noname-1.localhost

]]>