Comments for rviscomi.dev

Comment on You probably don’t need http-equiv meta tags by GG

GG — Mon, 03 Feb 2025 23:34:50 +0000

Obrigado pelas informações!

Comment on You probably don’t need http-equiv meta tags by Rick Viscomi

Rick Viscomi — Thu, 02 Jan 2025 13:10:01 +0000

In reply to P. Ruber.

Thanks! I do mention that near the top:

“If you’re deploying a static site somewhere like GitHub Pages, you don’t have control over the server or its response headers. If you need to set a header, your only choice is to use http-equiv or to migrate your site somewhere else.”

Comment on You probably don’t need http-equiv meta tags by P. Ruber

P. Ruber — Thu, 07 Nov 2024 22:20:07 +0000

It should probably be mentioned that the CSP http-equiv (or, for that matter, the referrer) meta tag does have a use case: on sites where one doesn’t have control over one’s own response headers.

See eg https://securityheaders.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Frviscomi.github.io%2Fcapo.js%2F&hide=on&followRedirects=on

Comment on You probably don’t need http-equiv meta tags by Aquaticat

Aquaticat — Sun, 18 Feb 2024 06:54:38 +0000

Not a suggestion, just wanna say thanks for writing this article. This is exactly what I need to decide if to include meta http-equiv tags (no)

Comment on A faster web in 2024 by Pedro

Pedro — Mon, 04 Dec 2023 16:39:11 +0000

> the biggest opportunity to speed up slow LCP images is to load them sooner

Wonder if is possible to do the same analysis and find what is the biggest for TTFB considering the sub-parts.