I am stupid and I want to understand each and every functionality of a piece of code in one screen.

Every time I see a class extending another class I get confused:

1. what do this class use of parent class?
2. how much parent behaviour is overridden and how much is genuine?
3. [all other well-known composition-over-inheritance debate]

I am bored to be confused, so after reading Ocramius article "When to declare classes final" I ended up writing a custom PHP-CS-Fixer fixer that puts final keyword on every non-abstract class - FinalInternalClassFixer (except for Doctrine Entities that relay on inheritance for proxying, grrrrr!).

Of course this does not delete abstract classes, but at least I gained that:

1. if I see a typehint against an interface, I know that the variable typehinted can be anything (of that interface)
2. if I see a typehint against an abstract class, I know that the variable typehinted may have multiple behaviours (withing the abstract class)
3. if I see a typehint against a real class, I know that the variable typehinted have exactly the class (and its parents) behaviour: no other class involved
4. Inheritance may happen only with abstract classes: trivial, but important

Still, a typehint on abstract classes exposes an undefined behaviour until you read every implementation class along with the abstract one.

Inheritance is unnecessary, but if you use it, make it final

Good interface abstraction and composition are enough for every scenario, but may be verbose.

The only use case I find inheritance acceptable is to enforce a part of a behaviour that would be too verbose to write otherwise.

Template method pattern is the way to adhere to an interface specifying only a part of the full behaviour, letting a subclass the rest of it.

interface Employee
{
    public function work();
    public function relax();
}

final class Secretary implements Employee
{
    public function work()
    {
        echo "I'm switching on the PC";
    }

    public function relax()
    {
        echo "Having a coffee";
    }
}

abstract class Operative implements Employee
{
    final public function work()
    {
        // Here we are: half behaviour enforced due to final keyword
        echo "Protective clothes worn";

        // The other half delegated to subclass due to internal interface
        $this->getHandsDirty();
    }

    abstract protected function getHandsDirty();
}

final class Lumberjack extends Operative
{
    protected function getHandsDirty()
    {
        echo "Got the chainsaw";
    }

    public function relax()
    {
        echo "Sunbathing";
    }
}

A Secretary doesn't need protective clothes, while an Operative must wear them.

In respect of a scenario that I would consider ideal, the example shows some flaws:

1. Employee interface hides a security-related behaviour (wearing or not the protective clothes) that is still hidden
2. creates a new hidden, although internal, API (getHandsDirty)

But at least all the intentions behind Operative abstract class is entirely in its code and can't be overwritten.

Lumberjack will always expose a behaviour that is the result of two classes, which is bad, but al least the two classes have strictly separated and distinguishable behaviours, which is good.

If you are going to move from an inheritance nightmare to a composition/clear-API heaven, the first step for sure is to segregate responsibilities between parents and children.

I wrote another fixer for this purpose, FinalAbstractPublicFixer, to make sure no developer in the team can fall again in that bad design.

Thank you Ocramius for the code (I stole you).