hey, been just curious about what is your full opinion on protectionism & free trade? I Heard that you consider yourself a classical liberal aswell, but you also seem to support protectionism, which is something that kind of contradicts classical liberal values of free trade & exchange from what I am aware of.

LikeLike

LikeLike

LikeLike

The positions of Ust Ishim, Tianyuan, etc in PC space likely means that by 45 and especially 40 kY ago there was already some hybridization between the core WE cluster and remaining middle-paleolithic East Asian population. This should not be a surprise, as UP expansion into East Siberia was already well under way. Yet Africa is nowhere in this picture.

This is too long for a post comment, but I suggested how such pattern could arise, in case you’re interested.

https://www.academia.edu/129039377/Western_Eurasian_Origin_of_Modern_Humans

LikeLike

The earliest Eurasian samples like Ust Ishim and Zlaty Kun don’t cluster with East or West Eurasians but between both populations.

LikeLike

>but that demonstrates nothing other than hybridization.

Yes, hybridization – between the central (WE) cluster and two peripheral clusters (SSA and East/Southeast Asian). It is in this central cluster where population growth started after Toba/MIS 4 bottleneck, and its expansion – both numerical and of geographic range – that led to connections with peripheral clusters, occupied by middle-paleolithical populations. It is this central cluster that gave rise to absolute majority of today’s humanity. I don’t see any other mechanism that this shape of PC1-PC2 scatterplot could arise.

>evidence that hg C, for example, is of West Eurasian origin

Hg C is a sister of F, the most demographically successful haplogroup (~90% of today’s humanity). F and C and D (except for tiny D0) are completely absent in Africa, so what is a possible mechanism for their emergence in Africa and then complete disappearance of these hugely successful haplogroups there?

The oldest Eurasian DNA samples are of ancestral  hg C and F, and F eventually prevailed. I don’t see how it could contradict Eurasian origin of the whole CF (and in fact whole CT) line.

>like the Levant Emiran Culture being disconnected from cultures within Africa

Yes, not only Emiran, but the whole Upper Paleolithic phenomenon is purely Eurasian origin, it came to Africa much later.

LikeLike

Recent OoA model for Eurasian origins is supported by current genetic evidence, not debunked by it. Archaeological evidence for Recent OoA is where the problems arise, like the Levant Emiran Culture being disconnected from cultures within Africa.

No geneticist would claim that all modern humans descend from KhoiSan or Pygmies, they’re just two populations that have the earliest dates of divergence from all other humans.

Claiming that West Eurasians are the “core of humanity” makes as little sense as claiming that we all descend from Sub-Saharan Africans. When a population diverges into two subpopulations, it’s anachronistic to suggest that one of the subpopulations gave rise to the other. Plus, the date of divergence between East and West Eurasians, thousands of years after Eurasians diverged from Africans, disproves this theory.

On PCAs, there are (more or less) two large clines running from West Eurasians to Africans and East Eurasians, but that demonstrates nothing other than hybridization. That West Eurasians appear to be the “origin” of humanity is a coincidence of geography.

Where is the evidence that hg C, for example, is of West Eurasian origin? It likely predates the West/East Eurasian divergence, considering the earliest Upper Paleolithic Europeans all carried hg C.

LikeLike

I look completely White so people are always surprised when I tell them (in fact I have on occasion been racially abused by Maories as a ‘fucking white cunt’). My upbringing was a completely mainstream (White) Kiwi one and I hardly had any contact with Maori culture except for the odd funeral and indoctrination in school (which unfortunately has become even more pervasive and malignant since my school days). I was always embarrassed by the various institutional privileges afforded to me at various points in my life based on my nominal ancestry (I just the other day had a bilingual letter from the government reminding me I can enroll in the special Maori-exclusive ethnic electoral wards for our national and upcoming local elections. I threw it out.) and resented them on behalf of my non-similarly privileged White peers.

I was raised in a conservative Evangelical home and my politics have pretty always been right-wing or conservative in some flavour or another, even when I was completely unconscious of race. I certainly never had any awareness of myself as a mixed-race person or felt any kind of cultural clash or sense of being torn between two worlds. This might be attributable to my appearance and to the generally harmonious ‘colour-blind’ state of New Zealand society in the 2000s and early 2010s, particularly in the Christian church and school community in which I was mostly socialised and rarely left. Even as a child I instinctively identified with, was attracted to, and felt motivated to protect, beauty and order, specifically White Western beauty and civilised order. I remember seeing old British colonial monuments bearing inscriptions such as ‘For King and Empire’ and ‘Service Above Self’ and feeling something stir within me, something that responded to such ideals, of which contemporary Kiwi society otherwise bore no trace, on a primal level. I’ve considered myself a White Nationalist and National Socialist since around 2018 and haven’t looked back since.

I know anecdotally there more than a few mixed-race and even full non-White individuals who feel the same way and are allies of Whites or at least sympathetic to their plight (in my country they tend to be East Asians, especially those who were born here. And in the alt-right/wignat scene I’ve noticed a disproportionate number of them tend to be part-Maori like me. Maybe it’s the warrior genes) though of course one never hears their voices represented anywhere and as far as the left is concerned such people don’t exist.

Ultimately, since the essence of National Socialism is the sacrifice of the welfare of the individual for the sake of the survival of the group, I seek, sincerely, what is good for Western Civilisation and the White Race as a collective, not the good of myself as an individual. If at some point I were to excluded from a future White ethnostate on the basis of my mixed heritage I would weep–for joy, that such a day had come, that things had come so right from being so far wrong. Of course I would rather kill myself than be forced to live among savages. But it would be worth it just to live to see the Great Race restored to greatness once more. To witness that in my lifetime, and to have helped in some infinitessimal way to bring it to pass, is all I pray for. Sadly most people today, White and coloured alike, are incapable of conceiving a politics not based on individual self-interest.

LikeLike

You should check out some of the articles put out by White Paper Policy recently (on SubStack) re practical solutions. Some of the most Whitepilling content that’s come out in decades tbh. Mass repatriation/an ethnostate is completely practical, it just takes the will to do it.

LikeLike

The idea that a majority, or even a large minority, of mixed race people will identify with Whiteness, now or at any time in the future, is demonstrably false. Rather, it is obvious everywhere that mixed race minorities overwhelmingly identify with their non-White ethnicicity/race completely and not only reject White identity but are openly hostile to White people. For instance, in my country New Zealand (it’s a similar situation across the ditch in Australia) thanks to a history of precisely such extensive intermarriage as the Jew Kauffman describes all the natives have some White admixture and most of them are mostly White genetically. But far from the natives peacefully assimilating into a beiged “White” majority, non-White native racial/ethnic identification and cultural identity has not only sustained itself, but strengthened, undergoing a violent resurgence in recent decades and translating into an openly brown ethnonationalist politics and parties that have rapidly come to totally dominate our political and social spheres. New Zealand (or “Aotearoa” as it has officially though ilegally been renamed) today is genuine apartheid state with Maori as a privileged elite and White people the disenfranchised and exploited (for-now) majority. So that New Zealand will go from being 95% White in the middle of the last century to majority-Maori and minority-White by the middle of this one. Racial and ethnic identity matters to people–or at least it matters to non-White people. Far more than it does to any White person, even those who fancy themselves redpilled. Whether it be Algerians in France, Jamaicans in Britain or natives in America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, they will never relinquish their racial and ethnic identity under any circumstances or for any reason. Not in a hundred years, not in a thousand years, not in a million years. Regardless of their DNA or what they look like. Even when their portion of non-White blood is trivial (like mine) they will identify with the non-White group and against White people/Whiteness. Indeed, I have observed that the most vociferously anti-White mongrels are very often those with the very Whitest ancestry/appearance. It’s a case of protesting too much, I think. In order to separate themselves clearly from Whites and affirm their own (in reality only partial and precarious) non-Whiteness they must be even more vicious toward Whites than most of their kin. They universally are either indifferent to or despise their White ancestors. The idea that they will ever come to own or identity with them is fantastical.

LikeLike