You will own nothing and you will be happy.

You will own nothing and be happy mainstream media propaganda.

Globalist elites admit that they are creating a world government (or “global governance”).

Property for me but not for thee: WEF calls for a “reset” of Capitalism and the implementation of “some Marxism,” claims that “Capitalism and Socialism will need to merge.”

US workers lose $1 trillion, US billionaires mysteriously gain $1 trillion.

Funerals were banned throughout the West.

People prevented from visiting old or dying relatives (unless they used dehumanizing “cuddle curtains”).

Widespread police brutality.

Zero police brutality against the anti-White “Black Lives Matter” revolution.

The anti-White revolution spread to every Western country (and Japan, for some reason) during the peak of the pandemic.

Australia created military-run COVID concentration camps.

UK cops used spy drones to arrest people for hiking during lockdown.

Airpots implemented thermal imaging cameras to “detect COVID.”

Systemic dehumanization of vaccine skeptics (or “anti-vaxxers”).

“Vaccine passports” quickly transitioned into multi-purpose digital identity credit cards.

People without “vaccine passports” were banned from restaurants, grocery stores, etc.

Microchipping was a baseless conspiracy theory until the Pentagon invented one.

United Nations’ WHO launches compact on “pandemic prevention,” legally-binding for all 194 UN member states, to be signed march 2022 and implemented 2024. “An international convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemics […] can enhance international cooperation in a number of priority areas, such as surveillance, alerts and response, but also in general trust in the international health system.”

IMF’s Chief Economist calls for wealth redistribution in the form of a “solidarity tax” for “climate change.”

(Post-scamdemic): Globalists claim that the scamdemic was a “test of social responsibility” while calling for a carbon score social credit system.

Veganism shilling intensified.

As did lab-grown meat shilling.

Children born during the scamdemic are “almost two full standard deviations” less intelligent than those born before thanks to masks, lockdowns, and isolation.

Swedish study finds that lockdowns were pointless.

Dresden University study finds that so-called “Long COVID” symptoms are equally prevalent in teenagers who recovered from COVID and teenagers who never had COVID.

Globalists rebrand “Smart Cities” to “15 minute cities.”

That’s all, for now.

Bushnell’s final, pre-combustion Facebook post read: “Many of us like to ask ourselves, ‘What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?’ The answer is, you’re doing it. Right now.”

Many people on the Right jumped to write teary-eyed eulogies praising his bravery, his sacrifice, his moral conviction, his commitment to higher ideals — “a True Hero of the Anti-Zionist Cause!”

I, on the other hand, predicted that he was simply a mentally ill Communist who wanted to kill himself in the most performative way possible “to earn Reddit Gold in death.” Lo and behold, Bushnell’s recent Reddit posts:

“Sanity is a myth constructed to justify brainwashing and marginalization of people who cannot or will not conform.”
28 days ago

“I highly recommend The Bolsheviks and Worker’s Control to anyone interested in the history of Lenin’s praxis”
23 days ago

“Black power and worker’s power are not at odds with each other, but if they were… Black power >>> worker’s power”
25 days ago

“‘Common sense gun control’ should mean disarming the police and military first. Which means abolishing them. Which means doing a revolution.”
4 days ago

“TERFS FUCK OFF”
9 days ago

“You know what’s cringey af? Fatphobia”
4 days ago

“Whiteness erases culture. […] conforming to an authoritarian, prescribed culture such as, I dunno, settler colonial culture, requires the sacrifice of ethnic culture and the autonomy that creates it.”
3 days ago

“The Real Jesus only looks like a half-decent role model compared to the monstrosity that his followers created. But the seeds of the monstrosity were there from the beginning […] Jesus can fuck off”
20 days ago

Here are his opinions on Israel:

“Israel is a white supremacist, ethnonationalist, settler-colonial apartheid state. It was created by the UK 75 years ago and is propped up by US support. It has no right to exist. It constantly attacks the Palestinian people to gain more lebensraum for its own people, who come from primarily white imperialist nations to settle there. […] Israelis are settler-colonizers illegally occupying Palestinian land. Violence against people who are invading your home is self-defense“
24 days ago

“There are no Israeli “civilians” or tourists who have no part in the oppression of Palestine. […] “A music festival! How could it get more innocent than a music festival!?” That music festival was happening just three miles from Gaza, within site of the border wall. Imagine a similar event happening in the early days of the colonization of North America. Can you or I really say that Indigenous people are wrong for retaliating against colonizers who are rubbing their domination in their face?”
4 months ago

These Reddit posts mirror everything I’ve been saying about the Pro-Palestine cause for years: Anti-Israel sentiment is primarily motivated by anti-White hatred and the (inaccurate) perception that Israeli Jews are White supremacist colonizers who maintain an imperial outpost on behalf of the West. Read my article The Israel Question.

This freak was a quintessential mentally ill Leftist. Everybody on the Right who praised Bushnell failed a very simple test. Embarrassingly bad instincts. If this mutant didn’t commit suicide he probably would’ve conducted an anti-White mass shooting. I’m sure Bushnell’s “Right-Wing” fans will hand-wave this away and say “Well, he may have been an insane anti-White Leftist, but he still did something noble for the Palestinian cause!” To this, I say: Where are your self-immolation protests? You lack moral conviction.

Lastly, you should read this thread I wrote on Twitter, which lists countless studies on Leftists, and then tell me if you think Bushnell’s self-immolation was driven by compassion or narcissism and mental illness.

Over the past year, I’ve been extremely busy IRL and don’t have the time or energy for long-form writing. Frankly, I don’t enjoy writing long articles. It requires a lot of research and distilling my jumbled notes into cohesive articles is a laborious process.

This blog only gets 500,000 to 1 million article reads per year, depending on the number of posts I publish. That may sound like a lot, but it’s dwarfed by the number of views/engagements I get on Telegram and Twitter.

Future plans

Although I’ve neglected this blog, I don’t plan to shut it down or abandon it completely. It certainly requires some spring cleaning and I’ll be deleting old, irrelevant, and poor-quality articles over the next week or so. Many were written almost half a decade ago and I doubt they’ll be missed.

Regarding new content: Currently, I have 100+ unfinished articles and drafts. Most of these will never see the light of day but I’ll try to finish some of the better articles, like the History of Communism. I’ll also be copying some of my longer and more useful Telegram posts over to this blog.

I still plan on creating a small website (or something) for ‘basic redpills’ on all major issues today: Race, sex, ‘gender,’ immigration, crime, economics, IQ, etc. It will be extremely succinct, focusing on published studies, government statistics, and reputable polls. But, again, reading through hundreds of studies, extracting figures, streamlining things, etc. is a slow process.

In the meantime, you can find my postings here:
https://twitter.com/thltd_
https://t.me/thuletide
https://t.me/racerealismchannel

Ötzi the Iceman is the most famous Early European Farmer and the oldest natural mummy in Europe. He lived in South Tyrol around 3200 BC but his frozen body was discovered in the Ötztal Alps on the border of Austria and Italy, hence the nickname Ötzi. The Early European Farmers (EEF) originated in Western Anatolia and migrated into Europe during the Neolithic around 9000 years ago, where they displaced and interbred with native West European Hunter-Gatherers.

Ötzi was a short, 45-year-old man, measuring 5’3, and covered in tattoos, 61 in total. At the time of his death, he wore a leather coat, loincloth, and leggings, coupled with a stylish cloak made from woven grass, a bearskin fur hat, and high-quality snow shoes, waterproof and insulated, likely produced by the Chalcolithic equivalent of a professional cobbler. Analysis of Ötzi’s stomach contents revealed a diet of meat, roots, fruits, herbs, seeds, and bread. His last meal was a few slices of dried goat bacon. Ötzi wielded various weapons: a chert knife, a longbow, 14 arrows, a 5’9 wooden staff, and a finely crafted copper axe.

Unfortunately, well-armed Ötzi was killed in combat, likely bleeding to death after being shot in the scapula by an arrow, which lodged near his lung. Analysis of his body found numerous bruises and cuts to his hands, wrists, and chest, and cerebral trauma, indicating a blow to the head. However, DNA analysis revealed blood from at least four other people on his weapons and equipment, indicating that Ötzi had killed at least two of his attackers. Not bad for the Chalcolithic equivalent of a senior citizen.

Blackwashing

Ötzi recently received increased media attention following a new 2023 study (Wang et al). He has now joined the extensive ranks of Blackwashed Europeans. Early European Farmers aren’t new to being slandered — people have falsely accused them of being egalitarian, matriarchal, feminist pacifists for decades now — but this is the first time they have been described as “dark-skinned.”

EEF were 95% genetically identical to modern Sardinians (pictured below) and countless studies have consistently proven that they were phenotypically near-indistinguishable. They had light, tanned/olive skin pigmentation (Hanel 2020), often described as ‘intermediate,’ and mostly dark hair and eyes, with some instances of blondism and blue eyes (Allentoft 2022). The EEF skin tone would not look out of place anywhere in modern Europe. As stated by Lazaridis 2022, “intermediate skin tones are commonly found in present-day Mediterranean populations and pale ones in present-day Northern European ones.”

Moreover, the EEF’s light skin tone had evolved before they left Anatolia and was not an adaptation to colder and darker European climates: “Based on the comparison between LBK [EEF] and Anatolia_N, we did not see a major shift in skin color SNPs that are involved in determining lighter skin pigmentation, suggesting that this adaptation already happened in Anatolia” (Childebayeva 2022).

Below: Hair and eye pigmentation of Europeans dating from the Mesolithic to Bronze Age (Allentoft 2022).

Below: Principal component analyses from Lazaridis 2013 and Feldman 2019.

These well-established facts did not stop the corrupt authors of the new 2023 study from falsely claiming that Ötzi had “dark skin.” Nor did their own genetic data, which proved that Ötzi’s skin pigmentation was near-identical to modern Sardinians (only 0.002 darker) and slightly lighter than the more northerly EEF of the LBK Culture (who had light/intermediate skin).

The authors concealed this pigmentation data in the additional Supplementary Materials PDF (that nobody ever reads), while repeatedly calling Ötzi “dark-skinned” in the main paper. They also provided no information on their polygenic score methodology and only included one modern reference population. So, we can’t even translate these polygenic scores into actual skin tones.

Deranged journalists spared no time and immediately flooded the mainstream media with propaganda pieces claiming that Europe’s earliest mummy was a “non-White immigrant with dark skin.” Leftist academics were happy to help them peddle these lies. Johannes Krause of the Max Planck Institute claimed “People that lived in Europe between 40,000 years ago and 8,000 years ago were as dark as people in Africa, which makes a lot of sense because [Africa is] where humans came from” (quoted by Science News). Left-Wing artists, like Tom Bjorklund (who has a history of Blackwashing Europeans), produced ludicrous facial “reconstructions,” depicting poor Ötzi as a swarthy South Indian or Sub-Saharan African. Cue the endless, smug gloating from rabid Leftist hordes: “Mmm yummy racist tears. Why do you even care about his skin color, you bigot? Looks like Whites have no claim to Europe after all, it’s always been a diverse continent of brown immigrants.”

“Compiling data from various sources, it becomes apparent that violence was endemic in Neolithic [northwestern] Europe, sometimes reaching levels of intergroup hostilities that ended in the utter destruction of entire communities. […] Increasing competition and inequality are key factors that fostered the emergence of larger-scale human conflict and warfare.”
— Source: Conflict, violence, and warfare among early farmers in Northwestern Europe (2023)

“The new evidence presented here for unequivocal lethal violence on a large scale is put into perspective for the Early Neolithic of Central Europe and, in conjunction with previous results, indicates that massacres of entire communities were not isolated occurrences but rather were frequent features of the last phases of the LBK. […] A new violence-related pattern was identified here: the intentional and systematic breaking of lower limbs. The abundance of the identified perimortem fractures clearly indicates torture and/or mutilation of the victims.”
— Source: The massacre mass grave of Schöneck-Kilianstädten reveals new insights into collective violence in Early Neolithic Central Europe (2015)

“The scale and sophistication of megalithic architecture along the Atlantic seaboard, culminating in the great passage tomb complexes, is particularly impressive. […] the human expenditure required to erect the largest monuments has led some researchers to emphasize hierarchy, of which the most extreme case is a small elite marshalling the labour of the masses. Here we present evidence that a social stratum of this type was established during the Neolithic period in Ireland […] patrilineal royal families that are headed by god-kings”
— Source: A dynastic elite in monumental Neolithic society (2020)

“Here we report ancient DNA, strontium isotope and contextual data from more than 100 individuals […] dated to the western European Neolithic around 4850–4500 bc. We find that this burial community was genetically connected by two main pedigrees, spanning seven generations, that were patrilocal and patrilineal, with evidence for female exogamy. […] The differences between younger and older-age sex ratios suggest that older daughters, from around the age of 15, left to join new groups, again consistent with a female exogamic residential system.”
— Source: Extensive pedigrees reveal the social organization of a Neolithic community (2023)

“Nobody has ever given me a plausible explanation for why Greeks are white and Iranians are not. This is probably the best illustration of how arbitrary, unhelpful and pointless racial classifications are”

This is a classic argument used by foolish libtards who don’t know anything about genetics and anthropology: “Race isn’t real because neighboring populations sometimes have overlapping characteristics.” It’s called the continuum fallacy.

Even a five-year-old child could understand that “orange exists, therefore red and yellow do not exist” is fallacious gibberish, but it’s worth debunking this Twitter Communist’s argument in more detail. I’ll be focusing on Greeks and Iranians, but the arguments used in this article can be applied to any racial or ethnic group.

Debunking

Greeks are classified as White (which is synonymous with ‘European’) due to their genetic composition, phenotype, culture, and language. I won’t cover the latter two in this article because they should be pretty self-explanatory.

Most Greeks genetically cluster with other Balkan populations and are clearly distinct from Middle Easterners, as seen on the PCA below (Greeks are represented by turquoise X’s).

In terms of autosomal DNA, Greeks overwhelmingly descend from Proto-Indo-Europeans (Yamnaya and Corded Ware related populations) and Early European Farmers from Anatolia. The admixture analysis below shows that while Europeans and Middle Easterners share some common ancestors, we predominantly descend from distinct populations.

Greek islanders are often pretty swarthy and have notable Middle Eastern admixture (around 30%, see the Dodecanese population above). However, they are still genetically closest to Europeans and even the swarthiest of Greeks generally have European facial morphology distinct from that of Middle Easterners. Compare the crowd photos below, which are better representations of average phenotypes than random cherry-picked outliers.

That being said, a minority of European-like phenotypes exist in the Middle East and vice versa. This is because some Europeans (namely South/Central Italians and Greek Islanders) have Middle Eastern admixture, while Middle Easterners have some Yamnaya-related admixture and notable Anatolian Farmer admixture. It’s worth mentioning that Anatolian Farmers were near-identical to modern Sardinians, who have European facial morphology and pigmentation.

The bottom line is that we don’t define racial groups by random phenotypic outliers. Moreover, there will always be overlapping or intermediate populations between major racial groups, some of which are so admixed that they cannot be classified as belonging to a single major race. For example, anthropologists have recognized South Asians, Central Asians, Hispanics, and Horn Africans as ‘intermediate’ or mixed-race populations for centuries.

1. The Data

America:
Immigration is the most important issue for Republican voters, surpassing even the state of the economy. 71% support immigration restriction and 90% are dissatisfied with current immigration levels (Gallup, 2023).

Despite the ever-increasing immigrant population, a plurality of American citizens still supports immigration reduction (Gallup, 2023).

Australia:
70% of Australian citizens want immigration to be reduced, while 42% want it significantly reduced (TAPRI, 2023). 59% of Australians want to cap immigration “until [Australia has] sufficient affordable housing” (Guardian, 2023).

UK:
57% of British citizens agree that immigration levels are too high, with bipartisan support from a plurality of Left-Wing and a supermajority of Right-Wing voters (UnHerd, 2023).

European Union:
70% of European citizens within the EU are “worried about immigration” (EU Eurobarometer, Fall 2022). An earlier poll (INSA, Dec 2021) featuring 10 EU countries found that a majority of Europeans believe the continent cannot handle the minimum number of migrants intended by the EU (59%), that their views on immigration are not taken into account (51%), and that Europe needs more effective border protection (80%).

Note: Unfortunately, I don’t have any data on Canada, New Zealand, and most European countries outside of the EU. If you have any sources, please post them in the replies.

2. Commentary

If Western countries were truly ‘democratic,’ they never would have implemented open-border immigration policies. The Western public has been opposed to mass migration since it was imposed on us in the latter half of the 20th Century, and they remain so today, as proven by the data presented in this article.

Over the last half-decade, the so-called “Far-Right” has successfully shifted the debate on immigration by mainstreaming issues like the Great Replacement and anti-White hatred. Currently, 68% of Republicans, 37% of Canadian citizens, and 32% of British citizens believe that the Great Replacement is real and intentionally targets Whites.

Since the public already wants to restrict immigration, to further expand the Overton window, we must now campaign for the mass repatriation of non-Western immigrants. The line of argumentation is simple:

White people are being ethnically replaced via mass migration → The people being imported openly hate White people → Most Whites want to reduce immigration → Unfortunately, this will not solve the problem → Instead, we should peacefully send immigrants back to their home countries.

In this recent article, I propose that mass deportation is economically sound, logistically feasible, and achievable in a matter of years. All of the evidence is on our side and much of the public is too. Our biggest problem is the corrupt Western establishment, infested with deracinated cosmopolitans and deranged “woke” freaks of every variety.

Related articles:

1. Non-White immigration was banned throughout the Anglosphere before the Second World War
2. Mass deportation is economically sound, logistically feasible, and could be accomplished in a matter of years

During the second half of the 20th Century, decolonization forced millions of Whites to flee the Third World. Algeria, for example, expelled a million Whites (~10% of its total population) within a few years of gaining independence. Similarly, Tunisia expelled a quarter of a million Whites, while Morocco expelled just under half a million (~7% and ~5% of their respective populations). Between 1995 and 2005, one million White South Africans fled the country, citing violence as the main reason.

Huge demographic turnovers can occur in the blink of an eye or gradually over the course of decades. Kazakhstan’s native Kazakh population increased from ~30% in 1959 to ~70% in 2021, while the number of ethnic Russians fell from over 6 million in 1989 to under 3 million in 2021. Time is of the essence in the West, but the Kazakhs are an excellent example of a population that returned from the brink of demographic demise.

Aside from Kazakhstan, the aforementioned expulsions and exoduses resulted from brutal interethnic warfare, something we should hope to avoid. Western governments could (and should) prevent such conflicts from arising here by pursuing peaceful separation, but the window of opportunity is rapidly closing. If current trends persist, interethnic civil wars will become endemic to the West.

Unlike Europeans, who lived in Africa for centuries, most non-Whites have lived in the West for a few decades at maximum. According to the UK census, 40% of all immigrants entered the country within the last ten years. Non-White immigrants have no roots in the West, so they fabricate absurd revisionist myths, like “the ‘first’ Europeans were Black Africans” (National Geographic 2019, Dutch News 2023). They attack our culture, history, and race with open hatred. Repatriating people who are so poorly integrated will not be difficult, and mass deportation is more than justified in light of the ongoing anti-White riots, terror attacks, and crime sprees. Countries have expelled ethnic groups for far less heinous behavior.

There are no valid logistical arguments against mass deportation. Since immigrants were rapidly imported en masse, they can be rapidly deported en masse. Western government infrastructure is far superior to the sprawling NGO networks that ship immigrants around the world and onto our doorsteps. Western militaries could be put to good use for once, as proposed by Donald Trump earlier this year: “Under my leadership, we will use all necessary state, local, federal and military resources to carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history” (Washington Examiner 2023).

What the West truly lacks is courageous leaders but with the right men in power, things can change near-instantaneously. In El Salvador, the Far-Left was ousted in 2019 by current president Nayib Bukele, a self-proclaimed “centrist” (in reality, a conservative). By 2022, he had declared a state of emergency and launched a massive police operation to purge the country of gang crime. Within a year, ~60,000 gang members were rounded up and jailed, 1% of the total population.

Bukele has a 90% approval rating and receives endless praise from the public, while deranged Leftists cry: “Human rights! Democracy! Leave those innocent gang members alone, you tyrannous Caudillo!” Moody’s Investors Service predicted that Bukele’s policies would boost economic growth (Bloomberg 2023); mass deportation would produce similar results in the West. Crime rates would fall dramatically, trust and social capital would skyrocket, dangerous no-go zones would be opened up to investment and development, strained infrastructure would be saved from the brink of collapse.

“I feel calmer, I can go for a walk. I go out to walk every night with my young children. Before I didn’t even take them out.” “We have that freedom… to be able to use the public spaces in the neighborhood without any fear.” (Salvadoran public via Reuters 2023)

In the US, over 50% of immigrants are on welfare. In South Africa, 50% of the population is 100% dependent on welfare. We see similar trends in every Western country. Giving poor people free money reduces their likelihood of working (Verlaat 2023), but many immigrants simply refuse to work. They are here for one reason only: Our leaders hand them free resources on a silver platter. Remove that incentive and they have no reason to stay in countries they openly despise. Merely barring immigrants from receiving welfare while requiring them to pay for public services (such as healthcare in Europe) would result in a flood of self-deportation. Furthermore, money saved by denying welfare to immigrants could be used to fund mass deportation.

Thanks to recent whole-population studies conducted by the Danish government (2021) and Amsterdam University (2023), we now know the financial damage of importing and supporting non-Western immigrants. The Danish government found that Third World immigrants collectively make a net-negative lifetime financial contribution. This mirrors independent research conducted in the US, which found that the net-negative lifetime contributions of Blacks and Hispanics are so significant that they push the US government into a budget deficit every year.

According to the Amsterdam University study, all immigrants who entered the Netherlands between 1995 and 2019 collectively cost the country 400 billion euros, mainly due to “redistribution through the welfare state.” Israel, India, Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan were the only non-Western countries to provide an “unequivocal” net-positive financial contribution via labor immigration. However, for East Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Indian subcontinent, “the net benefits of one labour immigrant are outweighed by the net costs of one family immigrant.” Either way, flooding our elite institutions with nepotistic, high IQ foreigners is as risky as flooding them with self-hating White Leftists. Moreover, native Westerners produce more than enough capable people every generation. The US alone contains ~4.5 million Whites with an IQ over 130.

The above data should not surprise anybody familiar with national IQ estimates, which are the most accurate predictor of GDP by far: “70% of the variation in the wealth of nations can be explained by IQ alone” (Francis 2023).

If we consider the additional social costs of crime, political instability, the loss of trust and social capital, and so on, Western countries would be better off burning hundreds of millions of dollars every decade than importing non-White immigrants, particularly from the Third World. It would be cheaper to pay every immigrant a lump sum to leave than to keep them in the West, propped up by the White taxpayer. The Dutch government could give every immigrant a “go home” bribe of 20,000 euros and the overall cost would be nowhere near what they lose by nannying them.

All Western governments would profit enormously from mass deportation, but would the corporate and financial elite, who argue that mass migration is the only path toward economic growth? One only has to look to the Far East to see that this claim does not hold water. Take Japan, for example. While far from perfect, it is essentially paradise compared to the modern West: Crime free, clean, ~98% ethnically homogeneous, ~99% racially homogeneous, and free of interethnic strife. According to Western Globalists, it should be economically destitute due to a lack of diversity. The Japanese are also experiencing low fertility, yet their GDP per capita continues to rise alongside other G7 nations and Japan remains the world’s third largest economy. As stated by Lee (2015), “Japan is not experiencing economic decline and standards of living continue to increase at favorable rates for an advanced economy – faster than long-term productivity growth.” The same study found that “moderately low fertility and population decline favor the broader material standard of living.”

Although it is an economically sound decision, restoring racial homogeneity in the West is ultimately not an economic issue. Creating a world in which White children can play outside without fear of being stabbed, shot, or “groomed” is infinitely more important than financial gain.

Contents
1. Introduction
2. Summary
3. Supporting Evidence / Quotes

1. Introduction

I’ve been warning people about Eric Kaufmann for a few years now, but I still see nationalists claiming that this anti-White Globalist is somehow on our side. Hopefully this article will put those claims to rest. It exposes his entire agenda, as outlined in ‘Whiteshift,’ and includes countless quotations as evidence.

2. Summary

The Canadian-born professor Eric Kaufmann has been promoted by the mainstream media as “a political scientist who defends White identity politics.” (The New Yorker, 2019). This could not be further from the truth. Kaufmann is the human biodiversity equivalent of Jordan Peterson. His self-declared aim is to subvert White identity politics, disconnecting it from biological race and “exclusivity” and forming a new “inclusive” pseudo-“White” identity.

Kaufmann’s agenda is laid out in his 2018 book, Whiteshift, which was clearly written for an audience of Left-Wing elites, though it includes some bizarre pandering to Right-Wing nationalists. It is a political strategy document disguised as an academic investigation. Kaufmann’s primary concern is preventing a “right-wing populist” (i.e. nationalist) political revival, which would reverse the madness of multiracialism and immigration. Whiteshift is full of policy proposals to this end.

Kaufmann states that due to mass migration and interracial marriage, the West’s White majority will be unavoidably transformed into a hybridized, mixed-race population in the near future. However, he argues that this is natural and no cause for concern because the definition of ‘White’ (today a synonym for “European”) will be expanded over time to include people of mixed-race origin, a process he terms “Whiteshift.” He claims these ‘New Whites’ will look vaguely Caucasoid, speak European languages, and will, for some reason, identify with their European heritage and carry the torch of Western Civilization — despite the fact that mixed-race people practically never identify as White today and overwhelmingly despise the West.

Of course, mixed-race Eric Kaufmann, who “identifies as White,” is a notable exception to this rule. This is an obvious political ploy. By using himself as proof-of-concept, he encourages real White people to embrace racial extinction as we are overwhelmed by and absorbed into invasive foreign populations: If Whites can accept me — a Jewish Chinese Costa Rican — as White, then they can accept anybody! As stated in the book’s Amazon synopsis, Kaufmann aims to convince “conservatives to view ‘whiteshift’ as a positive development.”

Bizarrely, Whiteshift has been promoted by numerous influential pro-White figures, who seem to have ignored the book’s central message, which is explicitly pro-Globalism and anti-White. Perhaps they didn’t actually read it? Whiteshift does contain a lot of empirical data that may be useful to those who are interested in human biodiversity, but this data can be easily sourced elsewhere. Moreover, anybody can use good data to push evil messages. The conclusion to every Left-Wing study on social capital is as follows: “We may have found that diversity damages society in every conceivable way, but that’s just because we aren’t trying hard enough. Eventually diversity will be a good thing because… uhh… it just will, okay?” Plus, Whiteshift isn’t even a good book. It’s excessively long and repetitive, and Kaufmann constantly frames his personal opinions and predictions as absolute truth.

Kaufmann presents the Great Replacement as a natural inevitability. He denies that it is an intentional, top-down agenda, impose by Globalist political elites and Left-Wing zealots, fueled by an openly genocidal hatred of the White race. At the same time, he frames repatriation or mass deportation — the only viable solution to the West’s race problem — as a form of genocide, while heavily promoting interracial marriage, assimilation, and multiracial immigration, using typical Left-Wing race denialist arguments in his defense. It’s worth noting that the majority of non-White immigrants have been in the West for less than a decade and that the Great Replacement should be classified as a form of genocide as per the United Nations’ definition.

Kaufmann’s position is undoubtedly influenced by his own mixed-race ancestry, but also by his position among the elite as a professor and academic. He frequently offers advice to fellow elites on how to reduce support for Right-Wing populism, how to make Whites more accepting of mass migration, and so on. Kaufmann advises Globalists to grant certain concessions to the concerned White masses: Of course, White identity is as valid as any other ethnic identity (but we’re going to redefine ‘White’ to mean ‘mixed-race people’)… Okay, we can slow immigration down (if that would make you more comfortable with being ethnically replaced), and so on. He continually emphasizes that his theories should be used to guide the West through the transition from a homogeneous monoracial civilization, through the chaos of multiracialism, toward a homogeneous mixed-race civilization, akin to Central Asia.

Eric Kaufmann is far more insidious — and, frankly, downright evil — than radical Leftists like Tim Wise or Noel Ingatiev, who are at least open in their hatred of Whites. Kaufmann, on the other hand, pretends to be our ally while stabbing us in the back. Duplicitous “centrists” (crypto-Leftists) are the biggest enemies of Whites in the West. While the radical Left’s insane policies inadvertently awaken Whites from their slumber, serpents like Kaufmann stand ready and waiting with chloroform rags. He’s clearly a very intelligent man, which makes him all the more dangerous. Getting ahead of the curve to strangle the ascendant nationalist movement at birth was a wise move, as was extending a poisoned olive branch to nationalist intellectuals — many have been fooled.

3. Supporting Evidence / Quotes

I’ve provided a large number of quotes to eliminate the risk of misinterpretation. Similar statements are repeated throughout Whiteshift. Full quotes can be found after the list below, which summarizes each quote in one sentence.

1. White identity is real [opening statement to win over hapless White people]
2. The entire purpose of this book is to neuter nationalism
3. The challenge is to trick Whites into embracing Globalism, the Great Replacement, White genocide
4. If Whites are told that White genocide is inevitable, they will embrace it
5. New Globalism, like old Globalism, but sneakier
6. Politicians must tailor their lies to different audiences [as Kaufmann does]
7. Politicians should promote a modified version of civic “nationalism”
8. Old Multiculturalism is causing instability, we need New Multiculturalism
9. Arabs are just as French as real French people
10. This is NOT multiculturalism 2.0
11. It’s only important to acknowledge White interests so that we can mitigate White interests
12. Making small concessions to Whites will reduce resistance to Globalist agendas
13. Far-Left policies cause problems for “legitimate” anti-racists
14. Whites becoming mixed-race is inevitable
15. Elites must maintain stability as White nations transition from monoracial, to multiracial, to mixed-race
16. Nationalistic Whites are terrorists; race-mixing will solve all of our problems
17. Politicians must use “whiteshift” rhetoric to neuter potential resistance
18. Deporting immigrants is genocide
19. Using state power to enforce Globalism is good
20. Wanting to kick out foreigners and avoiding race-mixing is evil
21. Wanting immigration to increase the share of non-Whites is good
22. Nationalism is a disease
23. Whites need to become mixed-race, like Jews
24. White identity needs to be opened up to the world
25. Whites must accept mixed-race people as White
26. Whites will technically retain majority status if they accept non-Whites as White
27. Unmixed Whites NEED to fuse with the rising mixed-race group (because this will diffuse nationalism)
28. Forging a new (fake) White identity is important to prevent secession
29. Immigrants can only become “White” via race-mixing
30. A nation is a country and not an ethnic group [huge lie]
31. White nations are not White people
32. Whites must be disconnected from the state
33. Erasing White identity from White nations is fine
34. In exchange for being culturally erased, Whites will be allowed some ethnic identity
35. You can have some White identity but not too much
36. Cultural protection but not for people who want ethnic homogeneity
37. Whites are allowed to advance their group interests as long as they don’t do anything that actually advances their group interests
38. Slow mass migration for pragmatic purposes
39. To stop potential resistance, we must be more careful in how we ethnically cleanse Whites
40. Defuse nationalism and restore faith in Left-Wing institutions by promoting assimilation
41. Assimilation must be sold to concerned Whites (“somewheres”) specifically [more advice for lying politicians]
42. Elites are helpless
43. Whites won’t really go extinct because they will live on plantations like native Americans
44. Whites won’t really go extinct because mixed-race people have some White ancestry [note: Modern humans have Neanderthal ancestry but Neanderthals are still extinct]
45. Whites won’t really go extinct because Blacks can sometimes have White babies [total nonsense]
46. Whites won’t really go extinct because Black people can just identify as White
47. You may have a Black relative and not even know it

—

1. White identity is real [opening statement to win over hapless White people]:

“We need to talk about white identity. Not as a fabrication designed to maintain power, but as a set of myths and symbols to which people are attached: an ethnic identity like any other. The big question of our time is less ‘What does it mean to be British’ than ‘What does it mean to be white British’ in an age of ethnic change.”

2. The entire purpose of this book is to neuter nationalism:

“Whiteshift is not just a prediction of how white identity will adapt to demographic change, but a positive vision which can draw the sting of right-wing populism and begin to bridge the ‘nationalist-globalist’ divide that is upending Western politics”

3. The challenge is to trick Whites into embracing Globalism, the Great Replacement, White genocide:

“The challenge is to enable conservative whites to see a future for themselves in Whiteshift – the mixture of many non-whites into the white group through voluntary assimilation.”

4. If Whites are told that White genocide is inevitable, they will embrace it:

“Minorities should be free to maintain their ethnic boundaries, but when voluntary mixing occurs this positive story needs to be told to allay conservative fears about an excessive accumulation of diversity. When the majority sees itself as having a largely mixed-race future, it may become more open to immigration. […] presenting evidence of intermarriage and assimilation to conservative audiences makes a significant difference in reducing support for right-wing populism.”

5. New Globalism, like old Globalism, but sneakier:

“I set out a vision for a new centre, which entails accepting the legitimate cultural interests of reconstructed, open ethnic majorities. This can pave the way towards a more relaxed, rational political conversation. The West cannot simultaneously accept large inflows and maintain culturally neutral immigration policies. Yet I am not arguing that it should adopt the exclusive East Asian model. A better solution is to balance liberal and minority preferences for more immigration with the restrictionism of ethnic-majority conservatives. The key is that the majority be an open rather than closed ethnic group. An open majority group’s conservative members will want slower immigration to help it maintain its share through voluntary assimilation – not exclusion and expulsion. Minorities should not be compelled to assimilate to a state-defined national identity, but, like white majorities, should be free to express their ethnically distinct versions of the common national identity – an arrangement I term multivocalism.”

6. Politicians must tailor their lies to different audiences [as Kaufmann does]:

“Politicians can affirm a multi-vocal understanding of nationhood by tuning into particular audiences. When speaking to liberals or an ethnically diverse crowd, they can talk about diversity and multiculturalism. When addressing conservative whites, it’s important to nod to white majority ethno-traditions. This is not hypocrisy, but reflects the reality of complex systems like national identity.”

7. Politicians should promote a modified version of civic “nationalism”:

“Politicians should maintain what Kissinger called a ‘constructive ambiguity’ about the content of nationhood, validating many different conceptions instead of attacking multicultural and ethno-traditionalist ones. People hear what they want to hear, read what they want into statements. When pressed on contradictory messages about national identity, leaders should reply that ‘there are many ways to be British’. Americans form attachments to different Americas: its politicians should reflect this. There’s no single way of being American.”

8. Old Multiculturalism is causing instability, we need New Multiculturalism:

“What states need is a new synthesis that taps the power of ethnic symbolism while remaining inclusive. Ethnic nationalism has richness, but excludes minorities. Multiculturalism is rich and inclusive, but excludes the majority and can weaken commitment to the nation. My preferred alternative is multivocalism […] If we stop thinking about national identity as a hymn sheet everyone has to sing from and begin to see it as a set of resources people shape in different ways, this opens up new vistas.”

9. Arabs are just as French as real French people:

“This means a French woman of Algerian descent living in a Paris suburb sees the nation differently from a farmer from Gascony whose ancestors have been living there for generations. The Gascon identifies through his ancestry and region to France, a more ethno-traditional form of identity with the nation. By contrast, the Franco-Algerian woman might lack the historical-ancestral-rural module of Frenchness. Hence our Franco-Algerian may identify with France through her neighbourhood, Franco-Algerian subculture and multicultural Paris.”

10. This is NOT multiculturalism 2.0:

“There is no single, superior form of national identity: rather it is everywhere and nowhere, with everyone glancing at it from a different angle and belonging to it in their own way. Notice this is not multiculturalism, because the Franco-Algerian woman isn’t focused on Algeria, but on France. […] Where multiculturalism draws people’s gaze back to a distant homeland, multivocalism orients them to the nation, albeit viewed through different ethnic lenses. This flexibility maximizes meaning and unity by harnessing the complexity of national identity.”

11. It’s only important to acknowledge White interests so that we can mitigate White interests:

“If politics in the West is ever to return to normal rather than becoming even more polarized, white interests will need to be discussed. I realize this is very controversial for left-modernists. Yet not only is white group self-interest legitimate, but I maintain that in an era of unprecedented white demographic decline it is absolutely vital for it to have a democratic outlet. Marginalizing race puritanism is important, but muzzling relaxed versions of white identity sublimates it in a host of negative ways.”

12. Making small concessions to Whites will reduce resistance to Globalist agendas:

“Right-wing populism, which champions the cultural interests of group-oriented whites, has halted and reversed the multicultural consensus which held sway between the 1960s and late 1990s. This is leading to a polarization between those who accept, and those who reject, the ideology of diversity. What’s needed is a new vision that gives conservative members of white majorities hope for their group’s future while permitting cosmopolitans the freedom to celebrate diversity.”

13. Far-Left policies cause problems for “legitimate” anti-racists:

“I argue that a moral-repression strategy for containing white conservative discontent, if perceived as an illegitimate overreach, could result in blowback at a later date. […] Political correctness initially inhibits white conservative grievances, populist-right voting and centre-right mobilization against immigration and multiculturalism. However, once the populist right breaks across a threshold, the system shifts. Populist-right success leads the centre-right to adopt anti-immigration policies, which in turn weakens the hold of taboos. Once this occurs, political correctness, instead of acting as a brake on white conservative grievance and populist-right voting, is exposed and can propel populism to greater heights. At the very least, anti-racist repression becomes a mixed blessing. The risk here is that the illegitimate expansion of the anti-racist norm is rolled back to the point that legitimate anti-racist norms come under attack.”

14. Whites becoming mixed-race is inevitable:

“whites can no more hold back demography than Canute could command the tides. In the West, even without immigration, we’re becoming mixed-race. This is not speculation, but is virtually guaranteed by the rates of intermarriage occurring in many Western countries. […] In two centuries, few people living in urban areas of the West will have an unmixed racial background.”

15. Elites must maintain stability as White nations transition from monoracial, to multiracial, to mixed-race:

“We are entering a period of cultural instability in the West attendant on our passage between two relatively stable equilibria. The first is based on white ethnic homogeneity, the second on what the prescient centrist writer Michael Lind calls ‘beige’ ethnicity, i.e. a racially mixed majority group In the middle lies a turbulent multicultural interregnum. We in the West are becoming less like homogeneous Iceland and more like homogeneous mixed-race Turkmenistan. But to get there we’ll be passing through a phase where we’ll move closer to multicultural Guyana or Mauritius.”

16. Nationalistic Whites are terrorists; race-mixing will solve all of our problems:

“I chart the four main white responses to ethnic change: fight, repress, flee and join. Whites can fight ethnic change by voting for right-wing populists or committing terrorist acts. They may repress anxieties in the name of ‘politically correct’ anti-racism, but cracks in this moral edifice are appearing. Many opt to flee by avoiding diverse neighbourhoods, schools and social networks. And other whites may choose to join the newcomers, first in friendship, subsequently in marriage. Intermarriage promises to erode the rising diversity which underlies our current malaise.”

17. Politicians must use “whiteshift” rhetoric to neuter potential resistance:

“Will right-wing populism continue to surge? Western societies will grow more diverse before Whiteshift – melting and cohesion – sets in. Repressing white identity as racist and demonizing the white past adds insult to the injury of this group’s demographic decline. This way lies growing populist discontent or even terrorism. Ethnic majorities need a future, and civic nationalism can’t offer it. Instead we need writers and politicians to anticipate Whiteshift, using it as a vision to open up a conversation about majorities and the European tradition. This will enable conservative whites to find a sense of ethnic continuity in the rising mixed-race population, as well as in the persistence of unmixed whites in rural areas. Majority reassurance, far from leading to oppression, promises to reduce insecurity, opening the way for a return to more relaxed, harmonious and trusting societies.”

18. Deporting immigrants is genocide:

“In the West, the far right calls for ‘voluntary’ repatriation of minorities to create white ethno-states. Placing the obvious ethical problems to one side, there are two reasons why this is a near-impossibility. […] Only force could make them do so. Attempts to ethnically cleanse minorities like the Bangladeshis would have virtually no public support. […] Most conservative and order-seeking white voters in Western countries want to slow ethnic change, but would be horrified at the thought that innocent families could be ethnically cleansed because of the colour of their skin or religion.”

19. Using state power to enforce Globalism is good:

“A top-down approach based on a fixed set of universals flattens and alienates both minorities and conservative whites who identify with the nation through their ancestry and traditions. The goal should be to maximize freedom and solidarity. In this way, multivocalism is superior to both civic nationalism and multiculturalism. Instead of focusing on difference, or ironing everyone into commonality, governments should celebrate the different ways we identify in common.”

20. Wanting to kick out foreigners and avoiding race-mixing is evil:

“Majority ethnic groups’ attachment to their in-group is not racist unless it leads to unequal treatment of outgroups or a quest for racial purity.”

21. Wanting immigration to increase the share of non-Whites is good:

“‘it didn’t say anything about those people hating on another race, just they wanted more people like themselves around.’ ‘Trying to increase immigration populations isn’t being prejudicial to another race.’ ‘The motives weren’t based on any sort of perception that other races were inferior or less worthy. They were instead cold calculations based on social blocks and relative voting power.’ Needless to say, I share the views of this final group of respondents, who represent the views of the overwhelming majority of people in the West and beyond.”

22. Nationalism is a disease:

“Right-wing populism has little to do with economics, but arises largely from ethnic change, caused by immigration, which unsettles the existential security of conservative and order-seeking whites. […] psychological conservatives and authoritarians exist in all age groups. […] Right-wing populism could become an endemic feature of Western politics for the foreseeable future if immigration remains substantial.”

23. Whites need to become mixed-race, like Jews:

“As long as migrants assimilate, ethnic boundaries persist in the face of immigration. The Jews and Greeks have been around for millennia, but both contain a plethora of genetic inputs. Outsiders have been absorbed over time, but the key boundary markers – of religion in the Jewish case and language for the Greeks – have endured. […] I contend that today’s white majorities are likely to successfully absorb minority populations while their core myths and boundary symbols endure. This will involve a change in the physical appearance of the median Westerner, hence Whiteshift […] Getting from where we are now, where most Westerners share the racial and religious features of their ethnic archetype, to the situation in a century or two, when most will be what we now term ‘mixed-race’, is vital to understanding our present condition.”

24. White identity needs to be opened up to the world:

“the whites of tomorrow: they will come in all shades and most won’t look fully Caucasian but they will connect to their ancestors’ portraits and statues via the white archetype. […] The white group needs to become more open to those who wish to marry in or identify with its culture.”

25. Whites must accept mixed-race people as White:

“In Europe, white majorities in the West will only benefit from assimilation if they can move away from race to name/culture as the defining marker. […] this can’t work if group boundaries are closed to intermarriage and mixed-race offspring are excluded, the practice of whites in the Caribbean, South Africa or Mauritius.”

26. Whites will technically retain majority status if they accept non-Whites as White:

“if ‘white’ ethnicity opens up to those of mixed background who identify with their European ancestry – even if they don’t look white – then the ‘white’ share will remain a clear majority.”

27. Unmixed Whites NEED to fuse with the rising mixed-race group (because this will diffuse nationalism):

“where American WASPs and white ethnics could move to an established ‘white’ category to recover ethno-cultural security, it’s harder for many to envisage how the white majority will transition to a mixed-race one. […] The declining unmixed white population would then need to accept the rising mixed group and fuse with it. This vision of Whiteshift offers conservative whites a future as an ethnic majority whose group consciousness continues, thereby addressing the cultural and psychological malaise fuelling right-wing populism.”

28. Forging a new (fake) White identity is important to prevent secession:

“The American hinterland is unlikely to support white terrorism, but Republican states or rural districts may become openly antagonistic towards the ‘alien’ federal government and the cities. As I’ll argue, it would be far better if a transracial ‘white’ or ‘American’ majority could be forged which bridges rural and urban, as occurred when the largely rural Protestant population fused with predominantly urban Catholics and Jews to form a new white majority between the 1960s and 1980s.”

29. Immigrants can only become “White” via race-mixing:

“The real question is not ‘What does it mean to be Swedish in an age of migration?’ but ‘What does it mean to be white Swedish in an age of migration?’ The Swedish state will adapt to any ethnic configuration, but this is much trickier for the Swedish ethnic majority. While Sweden can make citizens in an afternoon, immigrants can only become ethnic Swedes through a multi-generational process of intermarriage and secularization.”

30. A nation is a country and not an ethnic group [huge lie]:

“Nations are territorial-political communities with clear territorial boundaries and political aspirations, which ethnic groups need not have. Ethnic groups, like the Jews, unite around common ancestry, whereas nations – such as Switzerland – can be multi-ethnic.”

31. White nations are not White people:

“But because it is not the nation, the white majority can be symbolically exclusive and celebrate its past. White Swedes are not the Swedish nation-state, so they can cherish exclusive symbols like Lutheranism and the Viking heritage.”

32. Whites must be disconnected from the state:

“Minorities are free to identify as they choose and are equal members of the nation. There must be a separation of the majority from the nation-state, with the most insular Salafi treated as no less national than a member of the ethnic majority. This separation will also benefit minorities, for, as Mona Chalabi writes, it’s important to define whites so they don’t simply become the invisible national ‘normal’ from which minorities deviate.”

33. Erasing White identity from White nations is fine:

“Scrubbing the white ethnic stamp from national identities, as governments are attempting to do, is fine, but to do this while suppressing the expression of white identity is problematic. Majorities like the white British have to stop thinking of themselves as the only true Brits”

34. In exchange for being culturally erased, Whites will be allowed some ethnic identity:

“In exchange for de-centring themselves from the nation, white Britons should be given free rein to celebrate their ethnicity and their more historicist, rural, ancestral version of British nationhood. Ideally white Britons would begin to appreciate that minority Britons, especially the native-born, differ greatly from co-ethnics in their ancestral homelands and represent distinct Creole expressions of Britishness which enhance national particularity.”

35. You can have some White identity but not too much:

“Ethnic identity is not inherently toxic, as some on the right believe, but, like religion or partisanship, needs to be moderate.”

36. Cultural protection but not for people who want ethnic homogeneity:

“Cultural protection is already recognized in the right of Native Indian bands to use cultural criteria to select who is allowed to live on reserves. […] There is no reason why a similar argument can’t be made at the country level in, say, Sweden or the Netherlands. […] This in-group attachment is not racist unless it leads to antipathy towards outgroups or racial puritanism.”

37. Whites are allowed to advance their group interests as long as they don’t do anything that actually advances their group interests:

“Whites should feel free to express a group self-interest so long as they accept the need to make compromises with other groups and wider national imperatives. They shouldn’t be labelled racists for holding group preferences […] An enlightened ethnicity, however, is one that balances the desire to maximize group welfare with an equivalent concern for optimizing the common national good of all groups.”

38. Slow mass migration for pragmatic purposes:

“None of which is to say change must be stopped, only that the desire to slow ethnic change is a legitimate expression of the ethnic majority’s cultural interest.“

39. To stop potential resistance, we must be more careful in how we ethnically cleanse Whites:

“The immigration system, not coercion and stigmatization, ensures that a balance is struck between diversity and assimilation. If intermarriage slows, the ethnic majority will call for lower numbers or more culturally selective immigration. […] An open ethnic majority will be more likely to view outsiders as potential recruits, removing the chance of zero-sum competition leading to the antipathy towards outgroups I define as racism.”

40. Defuse nationalism and restore faith in Left-Wing institutions by promoting assimilation:

“Only a dyed-in-the-wool utopian could gloss the troublesome history of Lebanon enough to hold it up as a model. This is precisely the kind of cosmopolitan imperialism that needs to be checked if trust is to be restored in liberal and international institutions. Indeed, cosmopolitan overreach by both left and right has fuelled populist-right blowback.”

41. Assimilation must be sold to concerned Whites (“somewheres”) specifically [more advice for lying politicians]:

“already, most voters overestimate the share of immigrants and Muslims by a factor of between two and ten. As noted, a message of change is appropriate only for liberals who prefer novelty to stability. Instead, Somewheres need to hear that minorities are a smaller share than they imagine, and that they will be seamlessly absorbed into ‘us’ as they have been in the past. […] When addressing conservatives, leaders should talk about the way immigrants are intermarrying and assimilating, following a time-honoured pattern which leaves ‘us’ unchanged. They should reference the actual small share of foreigners (since most greatly overestimate the number), connections to the country’s long past and timeless countryside. When speaking to liberal groups, today’s emphasis on diversity and change is appropriate, but this message is currently aggravating those who don’t share this worldview, feeding populism.”

42. Elites are helpless:

“As white majorities in the West age and decline, their place is being taken by non-Europeans. This shift pervades the popular imagination across Europe, North America and Australasia. While cosmopolitans embrace the change, populist-right movements feed on anti-immigration sentiment. Elites stand helpless as immigration soars to the top of white voters’ agenda. Mainstream politicians hector or dismiss populists, trying – and failing – to deflect white angst onto the familiar terrain of jobs and public services.”

43. Whites won’t really go extinct because they will live on plantations like native Americans:

“‘Unmixed’ groups of whites already persist as tight-bounded minorities in Africa, the Caribbean, Mauritius and tropical Latin America. Eastern Europe is following the East Asian model of maintaining societies based on closed ethnic boundaries. In the West, whites are likely to endure for millennia in isolated rural communities, just as unmixed Native Indians or Gaelic-speaking Irish do.”

44. Whites won’t really go extinct because mixed-race people have some White ancestry [note: Modern humans have Neanderthal ancestry but Neanderthals are still extinct]:

“The ‘beiging’ of America due to white-Hispanic intermarriage means that the share of Americans with European ancestry is not in decline. A leading sociologist of ethnicity, Richard Alba, notes that the US census bureau defines anyone with ‘one drop’ of minority identity to be non-white. This overstates the decline of whiteness. In 2013, half the country’s newborns were categorized as non-white in census terms, yet 60 per cent had at least one white parent.”

45. Whites won’t really go extinct because Blacks can sometimes have White babies [total nonsense]:

“Another white-genocide claim is that whites face imminent extinction through immigration and race-mixing. This is almost certainly false. Straight-line demographic modelling does provide some evidence for this argument, suggesting that on current trends, and assuming no geographic isolation, the last person in Britain will mix with a non-white partner in 980 years. The notion that whites as a race are facing extinction in Europe or America is more of a stretch. As mentioned, there is already non-European ancestry in the white population and even with a good deal more admixture, many will appear Caucasian. Even if non-European ancestry becomes dominant, chance will throw up archetypal white individuals, as periodically occurs when two black parents give birth to a white baby.”

46. Whites won’t really go extinct because Black people can just identify as White:

“some who identify as white may initially be miscategorized as black until people get to know their name, how they speak and more about their outlook.”

47. You may have a Black relative and not even know it:

“There are also numerous whites who may not be aware of their polygenetic origins. In provincial England, Cedric Barber discovered he was the descendant of Samuel Johnson’s freed slave Francis Barber from over two centuries ago. The blonde American actress Heather Locklear has a Lumbee Indian surname. Even Craig Cobb, a white nationalist, discovered he was 14 per cent black.”

ESG is a social credit system that forces corporations to comply with the Left-Wing political objectives outlined in Agenda 21. Globalists plan to enforce this via the financial system, only giving money to politically compliant companies. Lack of “diversity”? No loans for you. Don’t comply with “climate” regulations? No loans for you. It’s no different to banks banning politically incorrect figures. The UK’s Brexit warrior, Nigel Farage, is the latest victim of this disturbing trend.

This is why Globalists are panicking about a Right-Wing, nationalist revival in America.

“All major central banks recognise that the climate crisis and nature loss pose material threats for the financial system. But central bank mandates and political environments vary. Action on sustainability is a bipartisan issue in Europe, while in the US parts of the Republican Party are leading an anti-ESG campaign that is out of line with science and at odds with a prudent view on financial management.” (London School of Economics)

West Virginia has already threatened to ban big banks over their commitment to ESG, while Texas banned big bank ESG funds late last year (Axios, 2022).

Larry Fink (CEO of BlackRock, described as “a fourth branch of government”) spilled the beans on ESG and Diversity Equity Inclusion in a 2017 interview:

“You have to force changes. It has to be imbued in the culture of a firm. Behaviors across the entire firm in every region have to be similar, and every citizen of the firm has to understand what are acceptable and unacceptable behaviors.” (Fox, 2023 – longer video here)

However, Fink was recently forced to backtrack, claiming that he was “ashamed” to be part of the ESG political debate (Axios, 2023). Nevertheless, he affirmed his commitment to “conscientious capitalism,” stating that he is simply “not going to use the word ESG because it’s been misused by the far left and the far right.” BlackRock will still focus on decarbonization, governance and social issues.

So, what we are seeing is merely a change of marketing and branding strategy. Globalist elites are not backing down on ESG. Instead, they are trying to sell this astroturfed political agenda as non-ideological risk analysis:

“the letter sent to BlackRock last month by 19 Republican attorneys general, accusing the asset manager of prioritizing its “climate agenda” over the interests of pensioners’ investments. These developments unfortunately fail to appreciate that ESG, properly understood, is merely a collection of quite disparate risks that corporations face.” (Harvard, 2022)

Combatting ESG on a state level is the best course of action in America. I recommend looking into and supporting the work of people like Marc Malone (see Telegram post here).