ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAA
1
Category:________________________________________________________________Team Number:_________________
2
hackIMSA
Project Rubric		Exceeds ExpectationsMeets ExpectationsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsNo Evidence of InclusionScore
3
Usability (16-20) User interface is intuitive and efficient. All intended features fully function smoothly (80-100%) and are integrated into interface well.(8-15) Projects is mostly-functional (40-80%). Does most of the things it is intended to do, but is missing some functionality. Few additional directions are required to use.(1-7) Project functions to an extent (10-40%). Some intentionality is put into the user's experience but navigation is not intuitive resulting in numerous pain points. Code contains many bugs and errors that interfere with the quality of the project.(0) No evidence of effort to meet this scoring category was observed./20
4
Theme Relevancy(16-20) The content of the project directly addresses the prompt. Project has application in a clear, unique way and has realistic and unique real-world application to a competition theme.(8-15) Project addresses the prompt but diverges in some core aspects. It is useful in theory but includes a few logistical inconsistencies that may interfere with real-world applications of the project.(1-7) The project takes wide liberty with the prompt and is only loosely elated. Major correlation is missing.(0) No evidence of effort to meet this scoring category was observed./20
5
Computational Complexity(16-20) Multiple instances of effective yet concise application advanced computer science concepts exemplifying a deep understanding of said concepts.(8-15) Project includes at least one successful implementation of an advanced computer science concept.(1-7) Project includes attempts to implement advanced computer science concepts regardless of effectiveness.(0) No evidence of effort to meet this scoring category was observed./20
6
Design Expertise(11-15) Demonstrates exceptional graphic communication skills. Exhibits a cohesive color and font scheme and presents an aesthetically pleasing product complete with graphics.(6-10) Demonstrates adequate graphic communication skills. Exhibits a good color and font scheme with few inconsistencies and utilizes matching graphics.(1-5) Some intentionality is put into the aesthetics of the user interface but the chosen scheme includes major inconsistencies, distracts from the project's goal, or interferes with product usability. (0) No evidence of effort to meet this scoring category was observed./15
7
Creativity(11-15) The project presents an entirely original idea.The new project attacks a largely unidentified problem and provides a specific and groundbreaking solution.(6-10) The project adds a new, successful twist on an established design. The project must provide a better/faster/easier way to attack the problem, making a profound break from the previous design, ideally subverting it entirely.(1-5) Project attempts to present a better version of a very similar, pre-existing innovation.(0) No evidence of effort to meet this scoring category was observed./15
8
Organization & Documentation(5) Code is well-documented and readable. Follows good industry practices involving variable naming, commenting, and spacing conventions. (3-4) Program can be
read and is mostly in a
logical order.		(1-2) Code includes little-to-no documentation and is thoroughly unorganized.(0) No evidence of effort to meet this scoring category was observed./10
9
Sub Total


/100
10
Presentation (Finals Only)Calculated by Finals Rubric /30
11
Total






/130
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100