Education

500 students share one computer in Niger. Yet they're conducting advanced physics experiments that students at elite schools can't access. The secret? WebAR turning basic smartphones into portable STEM labs. Think about that. In Sub-Saharan Africa, fewer than 10% of schools have internet. Student-to-computer ratios hit 500:1. Yet mobile subscriptions jumped from single digits to 80% in a decade. Students already carry the infrastructure—we just weren't using it right. Traditional EdTech Reality: ↳ VR headsets: $300+ per student ↳ Heavy apps requiring 5G speeds ↳ Labs costing millions to build ↳ Rural schools: permanently excluded The WebAR Revolution: ↳ Runs in any browser, optimized for 3G ↳ No app store, minimal storage ↳ Science scores improving 10-15% ↳ Every smartphone becomes a laboratory But here's what grabbed me: A physics teacher in rural South Africa has one broken oscilloscope. No budget. Her students scan printed markers, and electromagnetic fields pulse across their desks. They run experiments infinitely—no equipment damaged, no reagents consumed. One student told her: "Engineering is for people like me now. The lab fits in my pocket." What changes everything: ↳ Mobile-first matches actual connectivity ↳ Browser-based works offline ↳ Teachers need training, not new buildings ↳ Inequality becomes irrelevant The Multiplication Effect: 1 teacher with markers = 30 students experimenting 10 schools sharing content = communities transformed 100 districts adopting = educational equality emerging At scale = STEM education without infrastructure gaps We spent decades waiting for labs that won't arrive. Now any browser becomes one. Because when a student in rural Africa explores the same 3D molecules as someone at MIT—using the phone already in their pocket—you realize: WebAR isn't shiny technology. It's a quiet equaliser making world-class STEM education fit into 3G connections and $50 phones. Follow me, Dr. Martha Boeckenfeld for innovations where accessibility drives transformation. ♻️ Share if you believe quality education shouldn't require perfect infrastructure.

The best alternative for a SWOT? Probably a NOISE Analysis, encompassing an organization’s Needs, Opportunities, Improvements, Strengths, and Exceptions. This is what it means and how to use it. While the SWOT Analysis is already decades the most popular tool for strategic analysis, the NOISE Analysis is an interesting and more structured, step-by-step alternative. Its five elements mean the following: Needs (N) What needs to be present for a plan or strategy to be achieved? What are the main issues that need to be resolved or next steps that need to be made for the organization to move forward and fulfill its stakeholders’ expectations? Opportunities (O) Which external factors will provide an opportunity for the organization to grow or develop? How do other organizations become successful? Which promising avenues for growth or development are there? Are there areas of untapped or unrealized potential? Improvements (I) How must the organization change to establish needs and take advantage of opportunities? Which process, practices, and infrastructure needs to be changed and enhanced to achieve what the organization wants and needs to achieve? Strengths (S) What is the organization currently doing well? How is success measured? Which distinct advantages and strengths does the organization have compared to others? Which resources, assets, and competencies can be leveraged to achieve what is needed? Exceptions (E) What is already present or occurring? Which process, practices or developments are already in place and can continue to play a central role in the future? Which projects or initiatives that are already happening can you further leverage? Compared to the SWOT, the NOISE Analysis is much more solution-driven and actionable. Rather than merely reflecting an organization’s status quo along four boxes, it has a strong step-by-step logic helping an organization focus and achieve its next strategic moves. Particularly interesting I find the last two elements Strengths and Exceptions. Both reflect what an organization is already good at and doing in line with the needs identified. As such, these elements reflect an appreciative approach in which strengths are leveraged. These elements also embrace the continuity of an organization and the reality that there are always projects, processes and practices already going on that can support a strategy. This makes it a more dynamic and realistic tool than a mere SWOT. When will you start your NOISE Analysis? === Want to substantially upgrade your strategy and implementation skills? Join our Certified Strategy & Implementation Consultant (CSIC) program now. Registration for our February 2025 cohort closes on January 31, so this is the time to decide to invest in yourself. #organizationaldevelopment #marketinganalysis #businessinnovation

🌍 We Can’t Afford to Get Climate Policy Wrong—A Look at the Data Behind What Really Works 🌍 In the race against time to combat climate change, bold promises are everywhere. But here’s the critical question: Are the policies being implemented actually reducing emissions at the scale we need? A groundbreaking study published in Science, cuts through the noise and delivers the insights we desperately need. Evaluating 1,500 climate policies from around the world, the research identifies the 63 most effective ones—policies that have delivered tangible, significant reductions in emissions. What’s striking is that the most successful strategies often involve combinations of policies, rather than single initiatives. Think of it as the ultimate teamwork: when policies like carbon pricing, renewable energy mandates, and efficiency standards are combined thoughtfully, the impact is far greater than any one policy could achieve on its own. It’s a powerful reminder that for climate solutions the whole is indeed greater than the sum of its parts. Moreover, the study’s use of counterfactual emissions pathways is a game changer. By showing what would have happened without these policies, it provides a clear, quantifiable measure of their effectiveness. This is exactly the kind of rigorous evaluation we need to ensure that every policy counts, especially when we’re working against the clock. If we’re serious about meeting the Paris Agreement’s targets, we need to focus on what works—and this research offers a clear roadmap. Let’s champion policies that have proven to make a difference, because we don’t have time to waste on anything less. 🔗 Full study in the comments #ClimateAction #Sustainability #PolicyEffectiveness #ParisAgreement #NetZero #ClimateScience

Let’s talk about hidden disabilities—ADHD, dyslexia, anxiety, and others that don’t meet the eye. Too often, these students are left to struggle because their needs aren’t immediately visible. But here’s the thing: when we ignore those needs, it’s no different from denying someone in a wheelchair access to a ramp. Think about it. Would you expect someone to climb stairs without the tools they need? Of course not. Yet we often expect students with hidden disabilities to navigate education without the accommodations that would level the playing field. It’s not fair, and it’s not right. Accommodations like extra time, clear instructions, or a quiet space aren’t “special treatment.” They’re the difference between drowning and swimming. They’re the tools these students need to show us their potential, not their struggles. I’ve seen the power of a single adjustment. They’re what happens when we meet students where they are. What if we reimagined education as a place where every student feels valued and equipped to succeed? What if we stopped seeing accommodations as “extras” and started recognizing them as essential? Here’s a question for you: Have you seen examples of simple accommodations making a big impact? Or do you think schools are doing enough to support students with hidden disabilities? Let’s share, reflect, and push for better together. Image Courtesy: No Nonsense Neurodivergent #Disability #Accessibility #SDGs #Equity #HumanRights #WeAreBillionStrong ID: Allowing a student with a hidden disability (ADHD, Anxiety, Dyslexia) to struggle academically or socially when all that is needed for success are appropriate accommodations and explicit instruction, is no different than failing to provide a ramp for a person in a wheelchair.

Ever wake up just before your alarm? It might not be a coincidence… It turns out, our brains have a natural way of keeping track of time, an inborn “clock” mechanism, which is synchronised to light in our environment. It’s got the coolest name for such a tiny brain region: the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) - literally, the group of cells (nucleus) above (supra) the optic chiasm (crossing). The SCN is essentially your brain’s “master clock” because it is responsible for coordinating our circadian rhythms. Light-sensitive cells in your eyes send signals to the SCN, which regulates melatonin - a hormone that makes us sleepy - via the pineal gland. Our species evolved to be diurnal, being active in the day and sleeping at night. As a result, daylight inhibits melatonin release, making us more alert. At night, the lack of light promotes melatonin release, making us sleepy. This is why for better sleep hygiene, experts often recommend limiting exposure to electronic devices for at least an hour before bedtime. The light from electronic devices can shift your body clock and this gets aggravated by heightened anxiety associated with doom scrolling -- neither of which helps your sleep. Want to support your brain’s internal clock? A few simple habits can make a big difference: 👉 Get natural sunlight in the morning. This helps reset your body clock. 👉 Stick to a consistent sleep schedule, even on weekends. 👉 Limit screens at least an hour before bed. 👉 Keep your bedroom dark and cool to promote better sleep. BTW, in teenagers melatonin starts to be produced later at night, which is why many teenagers don’t feel sleepy until much later in the evening. It’s also the reason they struggle to get up in the morning. For teens, going to school early is a bit like forcing them into a different time zone during the week and only letting them reset on weekends. When your teenager sleeps in on the weekends, bear in mind they are dealing with a genuine biological change in their circadian rhythm during the teenage years. So when you wake right before your alarm, blame (or credit!) your suprachiasmatic nucleus for being such a good time keeper! Understanding our biology helps us work with our natural rhythms rather than against them. How do you optimize your daily schedule around your circadian patterns?

Today, I want to share an incredible story that shows how the right kind of partnerships can be a game-changer in making a real difference. Vipla Foundation was set up by Mana’s mom in 1988, & ever since, Mana, Athiya, Ahan & I have remained closely involved in their mission of enriching the lives of underprivileged children & women. Their partners, Educo ONG are a global NGO with presence in 14 countries, they do some phenomenal work for the well-being & rights of children, especially the right to receive a quality education. This isn’t about endorsing Vipla or Educo, but rather about the magic that unfolds when the right kind of collaboration comes into play. Imagine this - two organisations with a shared vision of making a positive impact by ensuring every child in India has the opportunity to learn, grow & flourish. As partners since 2014, they’ve impacted the lives of over 500,000 beneficiaries through childhood care, education, inclusion & women empowerment through skilling. They’re transforming government schools, empowering teachers & bridging learning gaps through innovation & building communities that work with a sense of ownership in the education process. The kind of work that organisations like Vipla do, make them special. What gives their ambitions wings, are the right kind of partners. In that sense, Educo is just that. That’s the thing about forging new partnerships. If it’s done right, with the right people & at the right time, it can work like magic. If the fundamentals aren’t right, it’s not going get you what you want. Through my experiences, I’ve learned to look out for the following when I’m partnering with someone, Common purpose - When there’s a shared vision, sparks fly! It’s the only way to set the stage for extraordinary impact! Complementary expertise - Solo heroes may work in the films, not in real life. Find partners who can make up for your weaknesses & complement your strengths. Flexibility - Life always throws the odd bouncer at us. As partners, everyone needs to have the ability to adapt. Long-term commitment - Nothing good happens overnight. Vipla & Educo nurtured this partnership over a decade & their patience is paying off big time! Mutual empowerment - Just like your life partner, partners at work should be able to raise each other’s games. Partners thrive when there's mutual empowerment & trust. Measurable impact - Numbers don't lie! While you can enjoy working together with a shared vision, truth is the outcome should be measurable. In a world where collaboration is the new cool, I love giving the example of Vipla & Educo, who by working together have become architects of a brighter future! So, next time you're partnering with someone, tying up with an agency or a vendor, building a company or finding the right co-founder, remember to do it with the right people for the right reasons. #CollaborationForChange #SocialImpact #ChildRights #EducationMatters

I have a DEI secret… And it’s a big one. Ready? The accommodations I make for my neurodivergent team members… Also benefit my neurotypical team members. Ground breaking, right? 😏 I hear a lot about companies pushing back on accommodations, but I thought I’d show you just a few of the simple things we do here. I’ll use myself as the example, and let you see how it helps everyone. 👉 I like to sit on my legs and fidget in my chair. ✨ So we’ve got comfy chairs, wider than your standard office ones, for everyone. 👉 I regularly forget my breakfast or lunch. ✨ So we keep a fully stocked drinks fridge and snack cupboard. Open to everyone. 👉 Sometimes I find the main office overwhelming when I’m trying to focus. ✨ So we created two quiet workspaces in different rooms. Everyone can use them when it all gets a bit much. 👉 I used to get anxious about calling in sick and having to justify it to my old manager. ✨ Now? Just send a text. No explanations needed. If you say you’re ill, that’s enough. Applies to everyone. 👉 I had a habit of staying too late, sometimes working 3 or 4 hours longer than I should. ✨ So we finish at 4pm. And we mean it. Everyone is made to down tools and heads off. No late-night badge of honour here. I could go on, but you get the idea. There’s really no excuse not to make accommodations for your ND teammates. Because when you do… It makes things better for everyone.

Continuing from last week’s post on the rise of the Voice Stack, there’s an area that today’s voice-based systems often struggle with: Voice Activity Detection (VAD) and the turn-taking paradigm of communication. When communicating with a text-based chatbot, the turns are clear: You write something, then the bot does, then you do, and so on. The success of text-based chatbots with clear turn-taking has influenced the design of voice-based bots, most of which also use the turn-taking paradigm. A key part of building such a system is a VAD component to detect when the user is talking. This allows our software to take the parts of the audio stream in which the user is saying something and pass that to the model for the user’s turn. It also supports interruption in a limited way, whereby if a user insistently interrupts the AI system while it is talking, eventually the VAD system will realize the user is talking, shut off the AI’s output, and let the user take a turn. This works reasonably well in quiet environments. However, VAD systems today struggle with noisy environments, particularly when the background noise is from other human speech. For example, if you are in a noisy cafe speaking with a voice chatbot, VAD — which is usually trained to detect human speech — tends to be inaccurate at figuring out when you, or someone else, is talking. (In comparison, it works much better if you are in a noisy vehicle, since the background noise is more clearly not human speech.) It might think you are interrupting when it was merely someone in the background speaking, or fail to recognize that you’ve stopped talking. This is why today’s speech applications often struggle in noisy environments. Intriguingly, last year, Kyutai Labs published Moshi, a model that had many technical innovations. An important one was enabling persistent bi-direction audio streams from the user to Moshi and from Moshi to the user. If you and I were speaking in person or on the phone, we would constantly be streaming audio to each other (through the air or the phone system), and we’d use social cues to know when to listen and how to politely interrupt if one of us felt the need. Thus, the streams would not need to explicitly model turn-taking. Moshi works like this. It’s listening all the time, and it’s up to the model to decide when to stay silent and when to talk. This means an explicit VAD step is no longer necessary. Just as the architecture of text-only transformers has gone through many evolutions, voice models are going through a lot of architecture explorations. Given the importance of foundation models with voice-in and voice-out capabilities, many large companies right now are investing in developing better voice models. I’m confident we’ll see many more good voice models released this year. [Reached length limit; full text: https://lnkd.in/g9wGsPb2 ]

As a junior lawyer, I had to learn how to make it easy for supervisors to review my work. In case it helps, here's a step-by-step guide (with an example): 1️⃣Make it clear what the matter / document is and when input is needed. 2️⃣ Set out the context and approach to preparing the deliverable What needs to be reviewed, how was it prepared, and what’s the timeline? If you're attaching a document, include the live link to your file management platform (e.g. iManage or Sharepoint) as well as a static version. 3️⃣ Set out the next steps and your ask Make it clear what your supervisor needs to review. Set this out at the top of your email and proactively provide some recommendations. You can also follow up in person to make sure deadlines aren't missed. 4️⃣ Explain how the draft is marked up Make it easy to navigate with specific questions (either in the document or extracted in the email). If there are mark ups against a particular document / version, identify what that is. 5️⃣ Summarise your inputs Let them know what your draft reflects, and attach the relevant inputs so they can see everything in one place. This will give your supervisor confidence that you've captured everything, and make it easier for them to check your work. 6️⃣ Flag key aspects / assumptions If there are key assumptions / principles that have a big impact on how your draft is prepared, it's helpful to set them out in the email as a point of focus. Try to also set out the relevant clause / section / reference where possible. Is there anything else that you'd add? What else have you found helpful in making drafts easier to review, either as a junior lawyer or a supervisor? ------ Btw, if you're a junior lawyer looking for practical career advice - check out the free how-to guides on my website. You can also stay updated by sending a connection / follow. #legalprofession #lawyers #lawstudents #lawfirms

Major update on our work: In the last few years, a flood of new research has altered the landscape of the debate around kids, smartphones, and social media. 1️⃣ First, there is now a lot more work revealing a wide range of direct harms caused by social media that extends beyond mental health (e.g., cyberbullying, sextortion, and exposure to algorithmically amplified content promoting suicide, eating-disorders, and self-harm). These direct harms are not correlations; they are harms reported by millions of young people each year. 2️⃣ Second, recent research — including experiments conducted by Meta itself — provides increasingly strong causal evidence linking heavy social media use to depression, anxiety, and other internalizing disorders. (We refer to these as indirect harms because they appear over time rather than right away). Together, these findings allow us to answer the product safety question clearly: 📣 No, social media is not safe for children and adolescents. The evidence is abundant, varied, and damning. We have gathered it and organized it in two related projects which we invite you to read, in this post: https://lnkd.in/eAvfH3aQ