Comments for Schema.org Community Group

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Jan Caerels

Jan Caerels — Thu, 09 Jul 2020 12:08:42 +0000

In the art industry, there’s a call for an addition of “CreativeWork” subtype “Installation”.

This is because artists also have “Installations”, which are similar to Sculptures, but they are not “sculpted”, more like “assembled”.

I am curious as to where we can ask for these additions. Is this the right place?

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Radek Skowron

Radek Skowron — Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:18:04 +0000

Interesting initiative, but is it still an ongoing project?

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Vladimir Mitskevich

Vladimir Mitskevich — Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:38:47 +0000

“Schema.org is a collaborative, community activity with a mission to create, maintain, and promote schemas for structured data on the Internet” ( http://meta.schema.org/docs/about.html ). Everyone knows what “structured data” is? I don’t know, for example. What is “structured data”? Why no definition, no links/references?

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Florensia Gibs

Florensia Gibs — Tue, 23 Jan 2018 07:42:36 +0000

Hi, i’m very confused how to get a sitemap with schema.org, can someone help me to do this?

Best Regard.
http://surga168.com

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Dan Brickley

Dan Brickley — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:30:46 +0000

I am aware of no current interest in representing lottery numbers. Perhaps Wikidata.org would be interested in recording them?

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Sam

Sam — Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:25:38 +0000

Hi there,

Is there a plan to add new Schema for lottery numbers?
We want to show our lottery winning numbers in google. What is the best way to get that into Google if there is no schema available for it?

Thanks you

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Dan Brickley

Dan Brickley — Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:15:11 +0000

In reply to Jesse Greer.

I’d suggest repeating the whole ‘address’ block for each address, if you want to treat them as distinct addresses.

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Dan Brickley

Dan Brickley — Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:13:07 +0000

In reply to George Michaels.

You might find http://schema.org/docs/howwework.html helps. A great many of the improvements we’ve made to schema.org have originated in, or been improved by, community discussions.

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Dan Brickley

Dan Brickley — Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:12:00 +0000

In reply to Hans Polak.

Just added http://webschemas.org/robots.txt

Comment on Call for Participation in Schema.org Community Group by Jesse Greer

Jesse Greer — Sun, 03 Jul 2016 05:25:28 +0000

Hi folks. I have an interesting situation and possible solution I'd like to discuss with you. I'm marking-up a range of addresses for an "ApartmentComplex". My solution (and Google's Structured Data Testing Tool doesn't seem to mind) is to do this:


 div property="address" typeof="PostalAddress">
   span property="description">21-45 Carriage Way
   meta property="streetAddress" content="21 Carriage Way">
   meta property="streetAddress" content="22 Carriage Way">
   meta property="streetAddress" content="23 Carriage Way">
....
  span property="addressLocality">Hurricane, 
  abbr property="addressRegion" title="West Virginia">WV 
  span property="postalCode">25526
/div>

Thoughts?