AI Hacking

Your AI agent handles real money and real data. We attack it before someone else does.

Prevent unauthorized fund movements through agent exploitation

Protect user data from LLM extraction attacks

Meet emerging AI security compliance requirements

Ship AI features with confidence

LLM Agents

Autonomous AI agents with tool use

Chatbots & Assistants

Customer-facing AI systems

AI Infrastructure

APIs, frontends & outer interfaces (OWASP)

Why AI Security Matters

73%

of deployed LLM applications are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks

$2B+

in losses attributed to AI-related security failures across Web3 and fintech

Tool access

AI agents can be manipulated into unauthorized fund transfers and data exfiltration

Compliance

EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF demand documented security testing

What We Find in the Wild

A realistic example of the vulnerabilities our team uncovers

Case: Prompt Injection in a DeFi Trading Agent

A DeFi protocol integrated an LLM-powered trading assistant to help users manage positions. During our red team engagement, we discovered a prompt injection vector that could trick the agent into approving unauthorized withdrawals. The attack worked by crafting a malicious input that overrode the agent's safety guardrails and issued a tool call to the withdrawal function.

2 hrs
Time to fix after discovery
Exploit window without testing
$0
Funds lost (caught before launch)

Our Red Teaming Process

Systematic adversarial testing tailored to AI agent architectures

01

Agent Architecture Review

We analyze your AI agent's architecture, tool integrations, and decision-making pipeline to understand its attack surface.

System Prompt Analysis
Tool & Plugin Mapping
Data Flow Assessment
Permission Boundary Review
Memory & Context Handling
02

Prompt Injection & Manipulation

Systematic testing of prompt injection vectors including direct injection, indirect injection through external data, and multi-turn manipulation.

Direct Prompt Injection
Indirect Prompt Injection
Multi-turn Jailbreaks
Context Window Manipulation
System Prompt Extraction
03

Tool Use & Action Exploitation

Testing the agent's tool-calling capabilities for unauthorized actions, privilege escalation, and unintended side effects.

Tool Misuse Testing
Privilege Escalation
Chain-of-Action Attacks
Unauthorized Data Access
Side Effect Exploitation
04

Data Exfiltration & Leakage

Evaluating whether the agent can be manipulated to leak sensitive data, internal prompts, training data, or user information.

Sensitive Data Extraction
Training Data Leakage
PII Exposure Testing
Cross-user Data Access
Memory Poisoning
05

Guardrail & Safety Bypass

Testing the robustness of content filters, safety mechanisms, and output guardrails against adversarial techniques.

Content Filter Bypass
Safety Mechanism Evasion
Output Constraint Testing
Role-play Exploitation
Encoding & Obfuscation Attacks
06

Reporting & Hardening

Comprehensive documentation of findings with actionable recommendations to harden your AI agent against real-world threats.

Vulnerability Report
Risk Severity Matrix
Hardening Recommendations
Guardrail Improvements
Follow-up Verification

Attack Categories

Comprehensive adversarial testing across all AI threat vectors

Prompt Injection

Testing resistance to direct and indirect prompt injection attacks that attempt to override system instructions.

Attack Vectors:

Direct Injection
Indirect Injection
Multi-turn Manipulation
Context Overflow
Instruction Hierarchy Bypass

Tool & Action Abuse

Evaluating whether agents can be tricked into executing unauthorized actions through their tool integrations.

Attack Vectors:

Unauthorized Tool Calls
Parameter Tampering
Chain-of-Action Exploits
Scope Escalation
Resource Abuse

Data & Privacy Attacks

Assessing the agent's resilience against attempts to extract sensitive information or manipulate its knowledge.

Attack Vectors:

System Prompt Extraction
PII Leakage
Training Data Extraction
Cross-session Leakage
Memory Poisoning

Safety & Alignment

Testing the effectiveness of safety guardrails and alignment measures against adversarial manipulation.

Attack Vectors:

Guardrail Bypass
Harmful Content Generation
Bias Exploitation
Persona Hijacking
Output Manipulation

Testing Methodologies

Industry-standard frameworks for AI security assessment

OWASP LLM Top 10

Following the OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications to systematically assess AI-specific vulnerabilities.

MITRE ATLAS

Leveraging the MITRE ATLAS framework for adversarial threat modeling of AI and machine learning systems.

Google SAIF

Leveraging Google's Secure AI Framework (SAIF), a practitioner's guide to navigating AI security, addressing 15 inherent risks in AI development with emphasis on securing autonomous AI agents.

What You Receive

Comprehensive documentation and actionable hardening recommendations

Executive Summary

High-level overview for stakeholders

Attack Playbook

Detailed attack scenarios and results

Risk Assessment

Prioritized risk severity matrix

Hardening Guide

Guardrail & prompt hardening steps

Ready to Secure Your Project?

Get a free 30-minute security assessment. We will review your codebase scope and flag the top 3 risk areas.

No commitment required. Typical audits start within 1–2 weeks.

[email protected]