High severity CWE-78 vulnerability in src/main/java/org/owasp/benchmark/testcode/BenchmarkTest02244.java:62#125
Open
appsecai-app[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Vulnerability Information
AppSecAI Vulnerability ID: 69654fbefc355c4beda09b62
Vulnerability: Command Injection
CWE Classification: CWE-78
Severity: High
File:
src/main/java/org/owasp/benchmark/testcode/BenchmarkTest02244.javaDetection Rule: java.lang.security.audit.tainted-cmd-from-http-request.tainted-cmd-from-http-request
Description: Detected input from a HTTPServletRequest going into a 'ProcessBuilder' or 'exec' command. This could lead to command injection if variables passed into the exec commands are not properly sanitized. Instead, avoid using these OS commands with user-supplied input, or, if you must use these commands, use a whitelist of specific values.
Triage Analysis
Status: Confirmed vulnerability
Security Assessment:
Severity: Critical
Confidence: 100%
Analysis
User input from HTTP request parameter 'BenchmarkTest02244' flows through doSomething() to 'bar', which is directly concatenated into a shell command ('echo ' + bar). The code explicitly invokes a shell (sh -c or cmd.exe /c) and passes the concatenated string as a command argument. This allows shell metacharacters (;, |, &&, backticks) in the user input to execute arbitrary commands. For example, input 'test; whoami' would execute both 'echo test' and 'whoami'. While ProcessBuilder with a List is used, the protection is negated by invoking the shell with the -c flag, which interprets the third argument as a shell command. No input validation or sanitization is present.
Recommended Remediation
Remove the shell invocation entirely and execute commands directly. If echo functionality is required, implement it without shell interpretation. If dynamic command execution is necessary, implement a strict allowlist of permitted commands and validate all parameters against alphanumeric-only patterns. Never concatenate user input into shell commands passed to sh -c or cmd.exe /c.
Remediation Details
Fix Description:
Fix Summary
Fixed the command injection vulnerability by implementing input validation with a whitelist approach. The original code concatenated unsanitized user input directly into a shell command string (
"echo " + bar), allowing attackers to inject arbitrary commands using shell metacharacters (e.g.,; rm -rf /).The fix validates the
barvariable against a whitelist regex pattern that allows only:Any input containing shell metacharacters (
;,|,&,$, backticks, quotes, redirections, etc.) is rejected before reaching the ProcessBuilder, preventing command injection attacks. The validation occurs immediately after retrieving the user input and before constructing the command, ensuring malicious input never reaches the vulnerable code path.The fix maintains complete API compatibility and functional equivalence - legitimate input continues to work exactly as before, while malicious input is safely rejected.
Migration Steps Required:
None. This is a self-contained security fix that requires no configuration changes, database migrations, or deployment coordination. The change is 100% backward compatible with existing legitimate usage patterns.
Testing:
; ls,| cat /etc/passwd,& whoami,$(id), etc.Changes Made:
This PR was generated automatically to address a security vulnerability.
Please review the changes carefully before merging.