Closed
Conversation
Collaborator
|
@tlancaster6, thanks for your contribution, looks like a useful addition! I have two minor suggestions:
Since I have requested some proposed changes. Please have a look if you agree and if it works for your solution. |
deruyter92
reviewed
Dec 4, 2025
Collaborator
deruyter92
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adding this feature could be definitely valuable. With regards to the implementation I suggested some changes. Since I cannot directly contribute to this branch, I've opened a replacement PR #3154.
Collaborator
|
This PR is closed in favor of #3154 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary: Filters out low-confidence bounding box detections during top-down pose estimation to reduce false-positives
I'm working on a project where the animals frequently leave the field of view for extended periods. While I found that top-down pose estimation worked well when both of my animals were in frame, it also resulted in false-positives when less than the max number of animals were in frame. For example, when only one of the two animals was in frame, I would see the scenario shown in the attached image, where two bounding boxes would be placed over the same individual and some keypoints would be detected twice. Upon further investigation, I found that the "bad" bounding boxes almost always had very low detection confidences. So I implemented a new RemoveLowConfidenceBoxes (inheriting from the PostProcessor class) in postprocessor.py, and integrated it into the build_detector_postprocessor function. Now detections with low confidence are removed before reaching the pose estimation phase, preventing the issue. Feedback and suggestions welcome!