Update Iranian flag emoji to Lion and Sun design#1922
Update Iranian flag emoji to Lion and Sun design#1922mobinaghrz wants to merge 1 commit intoDrKLO:masterfrom
Conversation
Replace the current Iranian flag emoji (U+1F1EE U+1F1F7) with the Lion and Sun flag design, which is widely recognized and preferred by Iranian communities globally. This change aligns with similar updates made by other platforms including X/Twitter. Reference: https://github.com/parsatajik/twemoji-ir-diff
|
@Arseny271 please update the repo to latest version matching the latest version of telegram.apk |
|
Muhamed amin |
|
Sffx |
|
100 |
|
1455566 |
|
Mahameda |
|
Honest question, why do you want to change the current flag to the flag of the monarchy which the Iranian people overthrew? |
Cuz rn, the monarchy is more acceptable by us, it is a way to show our protests against the current regime. |
Ah, tysm, I'll make the changes asap :D |
You think the wildly unpopular U.S backed monarchy that terrorised the entire country, overthrew the democratically elected government for the oil, created secret police, did so much terror that force the Iranian revolution was better? Why don't you support the democratic government the monarchs overthrew? Why not call for that government to be back? |
|
Immediately after the revolution, the U.S government armed Saddam Hussein and help Iraq invade Iran during which millions of Iranian died. Now, we think they are the good guys and they want what's best for Iran and the Iranian monarchy was great? |
Thanks, but I am well aware of my contrys history. But just think for a sec that how bad this so called diplomatic regime is that we do preferre monarchy. 40k dead ppl is much more than the 8yrs war we had with iraq, this should tell something. |
I guess you do not live in Iran , so, I implore you to take the words of the western media or the western propaganda social media accounts with the grain of salt.
All I'm saying is do not believe everything you read or heard about Iran from the western media, western government or the propaganda accounts. |
Western media??? I'm persian I don't need Western media man😂 |
Aren't you living in Canada? Are you saying that since you're such person you hear all the news and facts telepathically in your head without any media? I have not seen a single diaspora calling for restoration of democratic government. Only the restoring of Shah and monarchy which is strange. |
Okey and? My family and friends are still there.and when I say we I mean the majority of my ppl. And stop assuming thing about me. I was living in iran as a woman for 20yrs. |
That was just a question. I just find it weird that Iran diaspora supporting monarchy and protests outside of Iran with Israeli flags and calling for Reza Pahlavi's rule when he's an obvious Israeli asset given Israel recently missile-striked Iran killing a lot of civilians. I'm just curious about the logic behind all this. |
|
@thetaungg I understand that you consider Iran’s previous system and the former monarch to have been “dictatorial” ! Before reaching such a conclusion, it may be useful to look at historical data, economic indicators, quality of life, purchasing power, Iran’s political position in the region and globally, as well as international reports and documentation from that period. After reading your comments, I get the impression that your analysis closely resembles narratives commonly repeated by supporters of the current system, narratives that often downplay or ignore historical and economic data in order to justify the present situation. One of the simplest ways to compare the two periods is by looking at the national currency. Before the 1979 revolution, Iran had a fixed exchange rate, and one US dollar was worth approximately 70 Iranian rials. After the establishment of the new system, due to a combination of political and economic decisions, war, and long-term sanctions, the value of the national currency collapsed and has continued to deteriorate to this day. Currently, the Iranian rial is considered one of the weakest currencies in the world. This is not a personal opinion but a fact documented in international economic sources. Regarding civil freedoms, while the previous system was certainly not without flaws, political activity, protest, and the expression of opinions did not automatically result in physical elimination. Had that been the case, many individuals who later rose to the highest levels of power after the revolution would not have survived. As a concrete and verifiable example, the current Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran was repeatedly detained for political activities during the Pahlavi monarchy (pre-1979 era) under Mohammad Reza Shah. Nevertheless, as is evident today, he was neither physically eliminated nor permanently silenced, and he currently holds the highest official position in the country. This example clearly demonstrates that political detention during the Pahlavi era did not inherently result in the physical elimination of dissenters. This historical fact, independent of any value judgment, highlights a fundamental difference between the approach to political opposition in that era and what is observed in the present day. It is a historical fact that some key figures within the current ruling structure were repeatedly detained for political activities during the Pahlavi era (pre-1979), yet they were neither eliminated nor permanently silenced. On the contrary, they later went on to assume central roles in the new political system. This reality, regardless of political interpretation, indicates that the nature and scale of repression in that period differ significantly from what is observed today. Even when considering later narratives put forward by some of those same individuals, historical evidence does not support the claim that systematic physical elimination of political dissent was an established policy of the Pahlavi regime (pre-1979 era). This distinction is critical when comparing the two periods. In the current situation, openly expressing opposition to the ruling structure can lead to serious consequences, including sudden arrests and violent treatment without transparent legal processes. Over the past decades, numerous reports have documented arrests, torture, and the killing of protesters, many of which have never been independently or transparently investigated. At the same time, Iran is a resource-rich country, yet a significant portion of its wealth has been directed toward external projects and aligned groups in the region. Meanwhile, people inside the country face poverty, unemployment, severe inflation, and widespread social and economic restrictions. Limitations on digital access, internet disruptions or shutdowns, lack of freedom of expression, and interference in personal lifestyles are all part of everyday life for many citizens. I have lived in Iran for many years and have experienced these conditions firsthand, not through the media. That is why I am asking myself, on what basis do you, who apparently live outside Iran (in Yangon, Myanmar according to your GitHub profile), base your judgments on such certainty?! It is natural that some countries or groups would benefit from the continuation of the current situation in Iran, but this is not necessarily in the interest of the Iranian people. Regarding the eight-year Iran–Iraq war, there is no doubt that it was a humanitarian catastrophe, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths and massive destruction. However, examining its origins shows that the tense regional environment after the revolution, along with speeches and messages from revolutionary leaders that, in some instances, encouraged people in neighboring countries to pursue political change or uprising, played a role in escalating the conflict alongside decisions made by the opposing side. Therefore, attributing responsibility solely to external actors overlooks important historical factors. In recent years, casualty figures from protests have been heavily disputed. When there is no free access to information and official sources have a long record of withholding or minimizing data, it is reasonable to assume that the real numbers are significantly higher than what is officially reported. Visual evidence, eyewitness accounts, and reports from independent international organizations all indicate that the scale of violence has been far more extensive. Regarding claims about burning public places, the use of weapons, or violence by protesters, it is important to point out a well-known pattern observed in many protests over recent years. In numerous cases, reports have emerged about the presence of organized and unidentified individuals within crowds whose behavior clearly differed from that of ordinary protesters. According to eyewitness accounts, as well as images and videos that later surfaced, these individuals engaged in acts of destruction or provocation that escalated otherwise peaceful demonstrations into chaos. Such actions often serve to create justification for severe and indiscriminate crackdowns, where the response goes far beyond those actually responsible for violence and affects large numbers of ordinary civilians. This pattern has been documented in different countries and historical contexts as a method to delegitimize public protests and rationalize widespread repression. Therefore, attributing all acts of violence to protesters themselves, without acknowledging this context, does not provide an accurate or complete picture of what has taken place. Many of those who supported political change during the 1979 revolution now regret that decision. The younger generation, which sees its future and opportunities slipping away, is more determined than ever to seek fundamental change. This is not unique to Iran; history offers many examples of societies that, after experiencing a new system, reassessed the past as comparatively more tolerable despite its shortcomings. Over the years, there has been a large wave of emigration involving scientists, professionals, and young people. Living a normal life in Iran has become increasingly difficult, and even basic aspects of modern life, such as free access to the internet are heavily restricted. Millions are forced to rely on circumvention tools for everyday tasks, something that simply does not exist in many other countries. Before the 1979 revolution, Iran was a monarchy, and its last monarch was Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi. His son "Reza Pahlavi", due to the political circumstances following the revolution, has been forced to live abroad. Additionally, during and after the revolution, several members of the Pahlavi family were killed or assassinated, and many others were compelled to leave the country. What Iran’s political future should look like is a decision that must ultimately be made by the Iranian people in a free environment. However, it cannot be denied that a significant segment of society, especially young people, now views the past differently after more than four decades of pressure. This topic goes far beyond a single comment, and entire books could be written about each aspect. My intention here is simply to respond to the claims you raised and to highlight that Iran’s reality is far more complex than simplified media narratives suggest. Finally, it is important to address very recent events. During the widespread protests that took place on January 8 and 9, 2026, in various parts of Iran, numerous reports described severe crackdowns. According to eyewitness accounts and non-official sources, the number of casualties during just those two days was extremely high, with some sources referring to figures in the tens of thousands or even more. Due to a complete internet shutdown at that time and the lack of free access to information, precise numbers remain impossible to verify, and the full scale of what occurred is still unclear. In addition to those killed on the streets, multiple reports describe arrests, executions, and the elimination of individuals whose only “crime” was protesting, speaking out, or expressing dissent. After approximately 20 days of widespread internet shutdown beginning on those dates, large volumes of images and videos gradually surfaced online. Even now, new evidence of violence and mass killings continues to appear, particularly in Telegram channels and groups, which have become a primary source of information for many Iranians. Notably, many images and videos from the recent protests show demonstrators carrying the Iranian flag featuring the Lion and Sun symbol. This emblem is a national and historical Iranian symbol that appeared on the country’s flag under during the Pahlavi era (pre-1979 era), and earlier governments and was removed only under the current system (Islamic Republic of). For many people, it does not represent a specific regime, but rather national identity, history, and an Iran before predates decades of repression. From this perspective, adding an Iran flag emoji with the Lion and Sun symbol on Telegram could serve as a meaningful gesture of solidarity for many Iranians, especially those who have lost loved ones during these years. Such a step would send a message that their voices are seen and that freedom of expression, a value Telegram has consistently stood for, still matters. After decades of pressure, repression, and enforced silence, even a symbolic sign of international support can carry real meaning for people living under extremely difficult conditions. Introducing or restoring this symbol on Telegram would be a symbolic yet powerful act, signaling that the world is not indifferent to their suffering. Android: IOS: Source: |
|
Thank you for such a detailed response. To be clear, I am not passing judgements nor claiming I know more than Iranian people. If you know my country, we had countless revolutions and protests. I myself lived through many including 2 major nation wide people vs government conflicts, many racial/religious conflicts. So, I know first hand what's the real revolution looks like and what happens when people really revolt. During 2021 Myanmar revolution, entire national held massive protests which filled the streets for weeks before the shooting and execution started. Now, it's 2026 and it's still ongoing. Many young people armed themselves and still fighting against the military. People are still doing strikes, rising awareness, etc. We had internet and electricity blackouts, social media bans and we still do. If that many people hate the government, you cannot keep it under wraps. It's impossible. And if the government killed that many people, the same thing. There would be some sort of a proof. 40k 60k 80k corpses cannot disappear into thin air. The pattern I'm seeing in the social media that made me think it's propaganda or fake news is that the first day of blackouts in Iran, some accounts(which has history of spreading false news) started claiming 12,000 dead without any proof and people kept reposting it and I see some people who debunked it. After that it increase day by day and today I'm seeing the estimates from those accounts as high as 85k dead. Which is extremely suspicious. Another reason for my questions was constant seeing of Israeli flags in Iranian diaspora protests and support of Reza Pahlavi who is an obvious U.S puppet and Israeli asset(I know because he publicly says that he's a friend of Israel). And you say that in the post-revolution era, the Iranian economy crashed and the Iranian currency became weakest in its history. For me it's obvious why. (U.S and Western countries will tell you that sanctions only targets the government but it's not true. Sanctions never affect the elites. They only harm the people. I know that because I've been living under the sanctions all my life and I was able to briefly see how it is like for a country without sanctions during the democratic government era of 2016 to 2020. Sanctions are the collective punishment for the people for not revolting and not doing what they want to the current government) That's why I am very curious and extremely puzzle to see certain Iranians willing support another U.S backed coup given how it all went the last time and given how U.S and Israel's been torturing the country for decades. And I still haven't gotten a satisfying answer. Of course, in the end I fully support what the majority of the people want and if the majority say they want to change the flag, overthrow the current government, restore monarchy and allow U.S and Israel access to the country, who am I to judge? |
|
I do not want to be this much political on a platform like GitHub which can lead to suspension of my account and the disruption of my work. I apologize if I offended anyone. |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
ParsaSoroush
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My account was compromised. This approval was not made by me and the code should be treated as suspicious. I am dismissing this review and have secured my account.
Replace the current Iranian flag emoji (U+1F1EE U+1F1F7) with the Lion and Sun flag design, which is widely recognized and preferred by Iranian communities globally.
This change aligns with similar updates made by other platforms including X/Twitter.
Reference: https://github.com/parsatajik/twemoji-ir-diff