Skip to content

refactor: creating ESQ Entity instead of ENTT#117

Merged
ripel2 merged 5 commits intomainfrom
100-create-esq-entity-instead-of-entt-entity
Mar 12, 2025
Merged

refactor: creating ESQ Entity instead of ENTT#117
ripel2 merged 5 commits intomainfrom
100-create-esq-entity-instead-of-entt-entity

Conversation

@Divengerss
Copy link
Contributor

Related to:

I also renamed missing registry variables into core in various files to follow the naming convention.

@Divengerss Divengerss added the refactor Code Refactor label Mar 12, 2025
@Divengerss Divengerss requested a review from a team March 12, 2025 02:01
@Divengerss Divengerss self-assigned this Mar 12, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@ripel2 ripel2 enabled auto-merge (squash) March 12, 2025 08:48
@ripel2 ripel2 disabled auto-merge March 12, 2025 09:26
@ripel2
Copy link
Contributor

ripel2 commented Mar 12, 2025

I will force squash because the CI is stuck. Previous actions passed so it is fine

@ripel2 ripel2 merged commit 750a50b into main Mar 12, 2025
6 checks passed
@ripel2 ripel2 deleted the 100-create-esq-entity-instead-of-entt-entity branch March 12, 2025 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

refactor Code Refactor

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create ES::Engine::Entity rather than entt::entity through ES::Engine::Core::CreateEntity

2 participants