Skip to content

add warning to the nvjitlink ctor when falling back to cuLink#315

Merged
keenan-simpson merged 1 commit intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
keenan-simpson:nvjitlink-warning
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

add warning to the nvjitlink ctor when falling back to cuLink#315
keenan-simpson merged 1 commit intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
keenan-simpson:nvjitlink-warning

Conversation

@keenan-simpson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@keenan-simpson keenan-simpson commented Dec 19, 2024

close #303

Add a warning when we fall back to cuLink

@copy-pr-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

copy-pr-bot bot commented Dec 19, 2024

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@keenan-simpson keenan-simpson self-assigned this Dec 19, 2024
@keenan-simpson keenan-simpson added enhancement Any code-related improvements cuda.core Everything related to the cuda.core module labels Dec 19, 2024
@leofang leofang linked an issue Dec 20, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@leofang leofang added this to the cuda.core beta 3 milestone Dec 20, 2024
@leofang leofang added the P1 Medium priority - Should do label Dec 26, 2024
@keenan-simpson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/ok to test

@keenan-simpson keenan-simpson marked this pull request as ready for review January 1, 2025 22:00
@keenan-simpson keenan-simpson requested a review from leofang January 1, 2025 22:00
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@leofang leofang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, Keenan, LGTM!

warnings.warn(
"nvJitLink is not installed or too old (<12.3). Therefore it is not usable "
"and the culink APIs will be used instead.",
stacklevel=3,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Q: Is stacklevel=2 not enough? I always forget which level is the right choice, but I'd prefer to not print out the cuda.core internal as part of the traceback.

@keenan-simpson keenan-simpson merged commit 5b98fdc into NVIDIA:main Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cuda.core Everything related to the cuda.core module enhancement Any code-related improvements P1 Medium priority - Should do

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Runtime checks for nvJitLink need to be tighten up

2 participants