Configure the issue label bot#11527
Conversation
|
Examples (check box indicate correct predictions):
The predictions are only as good as the user input. I think this is useful as a first level triage. cc @RDIL for his input. |
|
So far, from what I have seen, I’m not very optimistic for results here in this repository. Since the bot has the entire GitHub as it’s data set, one single person rating a deduction incorrectly throws off the entire data set by a bit. I don’t think it’s worth it, and we should most likely stick with issue templates which now have support for adding labels based on which template you use. If there is a self host option for it, that would most likely work 100x better because it will only be collecting powershell data - but the current hosted one is a no from me. Of course, this is just my opinion, but I think it should be taken under consideration. |
|
@RDIL have you used it only in the docker repo? or other places? |
|
No, I have not used it in other repositories. |
|
@RDIL I understand your concern, but I don't think we have enough data to determine if it's useful from the experiment in the docker repo. We would get that data much faster from the PowerShell repo. |
|
If you want to give it a try, you can go ahead with it. |
|
🎉 Handy links: |
PR Summary
Add configuration for the issue label bot so when we enable it, the bot will use our labels.
PR Context
https://github.com/marketplace/issue-label-bot
PR Checklist
.h,.cpp,.cs,.ps1and.psm1files have the correct copyright headerWIP:or[ WIP ]to the beginning of the title (theWIPbot will keep its status check atPendingwhile the prefix is present) and remove the prefix when the PR is ready.