Skip to content

FOUR-12445 Removal of Cypress from Core#5671

Merged
ryancooley merged 1 commit intonextfrom
FOUR-12445
Nov 29, 2023
Merged

FOUR-12445 Removal of Cypress from Core#5671
ryancooley merged 1 commit intonextfrom
FOUR-12445

Conversation

@josechirivella
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We decided to remove Cypress from Core since all the test suites live in another repo and this one wasn't being executed.

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy
ci:next

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link
Copy Markdown

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@tokensPM
Copy link
Copy Markdown

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-4de066f4bc.eng.processmaker.net

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit f5eff4c into next Nov 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants