Skip to content

FOUR-20909 invalidate cache on event#7808

Merged
caleeli merged 1 commit intoepic/FOUR-20326from
FOUR-20909
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

FOUR-20909 invalidate cache on event#7808
caleeli merged 1 commit intoepic/FOUR-20326from
FOUR-20909

Conversation

@devmiguelangel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel commented Dec 6, 2024

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Invalidate Cache on Event

Solution

  • Add invalidate method to SettingCacheManager

Related Tickets & Packages

FOUR-20909

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel changed the title FOUR-20909 FOUR-20909 invalidate cache on event Dec 6, 2024
@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@caleeli caleeli merged commit 5665379 into epic/FOUR-20326 Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants