Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 79.3%. Comparing base (2573399) to head (112b8a9).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #93     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     79.5%   79.3%   -0.3%     
+ Complexity     176     175      -1     
=========================================
  Files           23      23             
  Lines          774     774             
  Branches        89      89             
=========================================
- Hits           616     614      -2     
  Misses          96      96             
- Partials        62      64      +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

To add some further context... We used to depend specifically on:

• version 0.2.0 of crate dispatch2:
  

  java-watch/src/main/rust/Cargo.toml

  Lines 18 to 19 in 2573399

  	# we need this specific version of dispatch2, that still exposes the native type
  	dispatch2 = { version = "0.2.0", default-features = false, features = ["alloc"] }

• a particular PR, namely Use core-foundation octplane/fsevent-rust#44, of crate fsevent-sys:
  

  java-watch/src/main/rust/Cargo.toml

  Lines 15 to 16 in 2573399

  	# we need this PR as it contains an updated version that targets core-foundation
  	fsevent-sys = { git = "https://github.com/octplane/fsevent-rust.git", rev= "refs/pull/44/head"}

That particular PR was merged and released as version 5.1.0 of fsevent-sys in October 2025. However, the same release also contained commit octplane/fsevent-rust@c7c35d2 (not part of that particular PR), which updates the dispatch2 dependency of fsevent-sys to version 0.3.0. It also updates some of the types in the interface accordingly. These types don't exist yet in version 0.2.0, though, so for us to continue to use fsevent-sys, we would need to update to version 0.3.0 as well.

As updating to version 0.3.0 would require roughly the same (or more) code rewrites as the migration to objc2-core-services, this PR favors the latter.