Skip to content

49 Fixed small error where iterator could go out of bounds and remove redundancy.#50

Merged
mknaranja merged 3 commits intomainfrom
49-issue-with-define_coarse_nodes_onelevel
Dec 18, 2023
Merged

49 Fixed small error where iterator could go out of bounds and remove redundancy.#50
mknaranja merged 3 commits intomainfrom
49-issue-with-define_coarse_nodes_onelevel

Conversation

@CodingAllan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@CodingAllan CodingAllan commented Sep 26, 2023

Merge Request - GuideLine Checklist

Guideline to check code before resolve WIP and approval, respectively.
As many checkboxes as possible should be ticked.

Checks by code author:

Always to be checked:

  • There is at least one issue associated with the pull request.
  • New code adheres with the coding guidelines
  • No large data files have been added to the repository. Maximum size for files should be of the order of KB not MB. In particular avoid adding of pdf, word, or other files that cannot be change-tracked correctly by git.

If functions were changed or functionality was added:

  • Tests for new functionality has been added
  • A local test was succesful

If new functionality was added:

  • There is appropriate documentation of your work. (use doxygen style comments)

If new third party software is used:

  • Did you pay attention to its license? Please remember to add it to the wiki after successful merging.

If new mathematical methods or epidemiological terms are used:

  • Are new methods referenced? Did you provide further documentation?

[ ] The following questions are addressed in the documentation (if need be):

  • Developers (what did you do?, how can it be maintained?)

  • For users (how to use your work?)

  • For admins (how to install and configure your work?)

  • For documentation: Please write or update the Readme in the current working directory!

Checks by code reviewer(s):

  • Is the code clean of development artifacts e.g., unnecessary comments, prints, ...
  • The ticket goals for each associated issue are reached or problems are clearly addressed (i.e., a new issue was introduced).
  • There are appropriate unit tests and they pass.
  • The git history is clean and linearized for the merge request. All reviewers should squash commits and write a simple and meaningful commit message.
  • Coverage report for new code is acceptable.
  • No large data files have been added to the repository. Maximum size for files should be of the order of KB not MB. In particular avoid adding of pdf, word, or other files that cannot be change-tracked correctly by git.

@CodingAllan CodingAllan linked an issue Sep 26, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2f0f749) 27.93% compared to head (228b283) 27.85%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #50      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   27.93%   27.85%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          86       86              
  Lines        7023     7015       -8     
==========================================
- Hits         1962     1954       -8     
  Misses       5061     5061              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mknaranja mknaranja changed the title Fixed small error where iterator could go out of bounds and remove redundancy. 49 Fixed small error where iterator could go out of bounds and remove redundancy. Oct 9, 2023
Comment thread src/define_coarse_nodes.cpp
Comment thread src/define_coarse_nodes.cpp Outdated
Comment thread src/define_coarse_nodes.cpp Outdated
Comment thread src/define_coarse_nodes.cpp Outdated
Comment thread src/define_coarse_nodes.cpp Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mknaranja mknaranja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you have a look at @CodingAllan ?

@CodingAllan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Thanks for the review. The suggested changes look good. I updated it.

@mknaranja
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@CodingAllan There's a merge conflict, which is hopefully resolved when merging the new main. Could you try?

@mknaranja mknaranja merged commit baeac11 into main Dec 18, 2023
@mknaranja mknaranja deleted the 49-issue-with-define_coarse_nodes_onelevel branch December 18, 2023 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issue with define_coarse_nodes_oneLevel

2 participants