1212
COMP: Update ITK to release-5.4 branch hash 2026-02-26 by blowekamp · Pull Request #2535 · SimpleITK/SimpleITK · GitHub
Skip to content

COMP: Update ITK to release-5.4 branch hash 2026-02-26#2535

Merged
blowekamp merged 2 commits intoSimpleITK:releasefrom
blowekamp:update_itk_version
Mar 23, 2026
Merged

COMP: Update ITK to release-5.4 branch hash 2026-02-26#2535
blowekamp merged 2 commits intoSimpleITK:releasefrom
blowekamp:update_itk_version

Conversation

@blowekamp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Update ITK from tag v5.4.5 to the current HEAD of the release-5.4 branch (6dcda761aa8021a06124741b1a88adb88d859b75, 2026-02-26).

Update ITK from tag v5.4.5 to the current HEAD of the release-5.4
branch (6dcda761aa8021a06124741b1a88adb88d859b75, 2026-02-26).
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the SuperBuild’s ITK dependency pin from the v5.4.5 tag to a specific commit at the HEAD of the release-5.4 branch (dated 2026-02-26), aligning the build with the latest fixes on that maintenance branch.

Changes:

  • Switch default ITK GIT_TAG from v5.4.5 to commit 6dcda761aa8021a06124741b1a88adb88d859b75.
  • Update the accompanying comment to reflect the new pinned ref and date.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread SuperBuild/External_ITK.cmake Outdated
@blowekamp blowekamp marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2026 18:47
@blowekamp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

relates to SimpleITK/SimpleITKRInstaller#82

@blowekamp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@Artur-man This is adding the needed ITK patches to the SimpleITK release branch.

@blowekamp blowekamp merged commit a37cce6 into SimpleITK:release Mar 23, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@Artur-man
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ah super, will try it soon then!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants