All committers have signed the CLA.

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (5b9faf6) 95.77% compared to head (0aefde8) 95.77%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #192   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.77%   95.77%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         970      970           
=======================================
  Hits          929      929           
  Misses         41       41           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Hi @tetex7 ☕ 👋

Thank you for your PR.

A desire for toogle is one thing but I can say with reasonable certainty that any wrapper for GPIO access such your proposed digital input will not become part of the Arduino API for the foreseeable future.

The Arduino API is the lowest common denominator across the complete Arduino ecosystems. Furthermore the success of Arduino is based in no small part exactly of that very small API (pinMode, digitalRead, digitalWrite, etc.). There's no question that other and - possibly better- abstractions exist, but the chance of adding a redundant abstraction (i.e. in this case - a new was to access a digital input) is extremely low, to say the least.

Cheers, Alex

@per1234 i removed the C++ wrapper for the IO per request

sorry about the trouble it's my first pull request

So. I probably should have called this sooner, but there's little change that this API will be added to ArduinoCore-API. Unfortunately we do not have yet a set process of how to add anything to the Arduino language (or API) but I feel it's within my purview to close this PR (and ceasing to pretend that it might be considered eventually). If and when such a process is in place I'll be bringing in your API extension request on your behalf, should you not do it yourself.