Skip to content

adds optional revision in LookupPermissionSets#114

Merged
vroldanbet merged 1 commit intomainfrom
lps-with-optional-revision
Jul 16, 2024
Merged

adds optional revision in LookupPermissionSets#114
vroldanbet merged 1 commit intomainfrom
lps-with-optional-revision

Conversation

@vroldanbet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After the introduction of BreakingSchemaChange,
clients will be notified that an incompatible change has happened and that they need rebuild their index. In order to do that, they need to call LookupPermissionSets with the revision at which the breaking event happened.

This introduces an optional revision in LookupPermissionSets to support this use-case.

After the introduction of BreakingSchemaChange,
clients will be notified that an incompatible change has happened and
that they need rebuild their index. In order to do that, they need
to call LookupPermissionSets with the revision at which the breaking
event happened.

This introduces an optional revision in LookupPermissionSets to support
this use-case.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ecordell ecordell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We had some offline discussion about how this is potentially confusing, since you won't be able to pass in any zedtoken and expect it to work.

But we decided that this is okay for now, and for v0, and we can revisit as we move out of EA and into GA for materialize.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@josephschorr josephschorr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vroldanbet vroldanbet merged commit de42742 into main Jul 16, 2024
@vroldanbet vroldanbet deleted the lps-with-optional-revision branch July 16, 2024 17:47
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 16, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants