Skip to content

assignment one notebook updated#1

Open
deeqa-s wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
assignment_one
Open

assignment one notebook updated#1
deeqa-s wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
assignment_one

Conversation

@deeqa-s
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@deeqa-s deeqa-s commented Dec 1, 2025

1

What changes are you trying to make? (e.g. Adding or removing code, refactoring existing code, adding reports)

Completed assignment one tasks

What did you learn from the changes you have made?

Getting familiar with working with strings, For loops and nested If statement syntax

Was there another approach you were thinking about making? If so, what approach(es) were you thinking of?

I'm sure there's a way to create the anagram checker without a For loop so I will try and work on it!

Were there any challenges? If so, what issue(s) did you face? How did you overcome it?

Figuring out how indentation works with if statements! I just did it by trial and error. Also figuring out how to deal with repeated letters in a word.

How were these changes tested?

Tested the anagram checker on different pairs of words.

A reference to a related issue in your repository (if applicable)

N/A

Checklist

  • [x ] I can confirm that my changes are working as intended

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@xindizhang xindizhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your code meets the assignment requirements and is well-documented — great job! Your assignment 1 is complete – no changes needed.

Please see my suggestions for future improvement to make your code cleaner and more dfficient:

  • You're missing a return statement in the final if block — it currently only prints the result.
  • No need to convert strings to lists — strings are already iterable.
  • You're using both str.replace(...) and all(char in ...) to check for anagrams. This is redundant — choose one consistent strategy for clarity and efficiency.
  • Instead of is_case_sensitive == False:, you can use if not is_case_sensitive:. In Python, booleans already evaluate directly in conditions. That way your code is cleaner

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants